green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Mooney v. Tallant
But see United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Taylor
See United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,640 John William Davis v. Birr, Wilson & Co., Inc., a California Corporation, Defendants
(2×)
See, United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Sackett v. Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 890-91 (9th Cir.1968); Turner v. Lundquist, [ 377 F.2d 44 (9th Cir.1967) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.
See Berry Petroleum Co. v. Adams & Peck, supra, 518 F.2d at 409 (“[T]he broad remedial policies of the federal securities laws are best served by a longer, not a shorter, statute of limitations.”) (quoting United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dahl v. Gardner
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1014-15 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Brown v. Producers Livestock Loan Co., 469 F.Supp. 27, 30 (D.Utah 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Kirschner v. Cable/Tel Corp.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); see also Biggans, supra, 638 F.2d at 607, n. 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Equitable Trust Co.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appellees
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Seaboard Corp.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Townsend v. Columbia Operations
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Townsend v. Columbia Operations
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Der
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (C.A.9), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Williams v. Sinclair, 529 F.2d 1383 (C.A.9,1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2651 , 49 L.Ed.2d 388 (1976); Clegg v. Conk, 507 F.2d 1351 (C.A.10, 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1007 , 95 S.Ct. 2628 , 45 L.Ed.2d 669 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,379 John D. Robuck v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., a Corporation, John D. Robuck v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., a Corporation
See, United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); Sackett v. Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 890-91 (9th Cir. 1968); Turner v. Lundquist, supra. To the extent that some of the exchange rules require “due diligence” on the part of a broker, rather than merely refraining from fraudulent acts, any cause of action arising under them would be barred by the two-year state statute of limitations for negligence, Cal.Civ.Proc.
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,895 Margaret Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., and Kingsley O. Wright, Sr., Mary A. Braun v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Kingsley O. Wright, and Theodore Menas
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Briskin v. Ernst & Ernst
See United California Bank v. Salik, 481 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Settles v. United States
See also United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918, 919 (2d Cir.) (paper with name and telephone number used to prove association not truth of matter asserted properly admitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gayle King Shropshire
See also, United States v. Marra, 481 F.2d 1196, 1199 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973); United States v. Levinson, 405 F.2d 971, 977 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 958 , 89 S.Ct. 2097 , 23 L.Ed.2d 744 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carr
v.
Vann, County Commissioner of Thomas County
v.
Vann, County Commissioner of Thomas County
No. 73-338.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1973.
414 U.S. 1004
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.