green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
St. Louis Union Trust Company v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
But see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-381 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 50 Whether we analyze the causation issue before us in terms of materiality, reliance or both, the result is the same: causation in fact does not exist as a matter of law under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
cited
Cited "but see"
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
But see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-381 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lowenschuss v. Kane
These allegations of violation of our federal securities laws are indeed extremely general and obviously vulnerable to attack for lack of the particularity required by Rule 9(b), F.R.Civ.P., especially in the absence of any allegations of scienter or fraudulent intent, see Felton v. Walston and Co., Inc., 508 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1974); Segal v. Gordon, 467 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1972); Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 448 F.2d 442 (2d Cir. 1971); but cf. Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 378-79 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lowenschuss v. Kane
The complaint (Par. 22) charges that G & W and its chief operating officer Bluhdorn "warranted to the general public that the purchase of the 3,750,000 shares in question was for investment purposes and that said defendants had complied with all laws, rules and regulations pertaining to said tender offer and that there were no legal impediments to the purchase of said shares from the general public." (App. 13a). 16 These allegations of violation of our federal securities laws are indeed extremely general and obviously vulnerable to attack for lack of the particularity required by Rule 9(b), F.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenwald v. ORB COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING, INC.
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gap, Inc. v. Stone International Trading, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974) (requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) may be "relaxed as to matters peculiarly within the opposing party’s knowledge”), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); see also Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 468 (2d Cir. 1978); Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & Libby, 510 F.Supp. 366, 373 (S.D.N.Y.1981). .
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence v. Cohn
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Kidder Peabody & Co. v. Unigestion International, Ltd.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kahn v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See, id. (“To establish causation, the plaintiff must show ‘both loss causation — that the misrepresentations or omissions caused the economic harm — and transaction causation — that the violations in question caused the [plaintiff] to engage in the transaction in question.’ ”) (quoting Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Devaney v. Chester
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. *1261 976, 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Dingler v. T.J. Raney & Sons, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartman v. Blinder
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 , 943 n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Becker v. Silverman
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kademian v. Ladish Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,764 Charles Kademian and Stan Janes v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation, Stan Janes v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation, William Dixon, Jane Schennum and Robert Eisele v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hatrock v. Edward Jones & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hatrock v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. F.A.G. Bearings Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities Litigation
Robins Co., 607 F.2d 545 , 553 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 2175 , 64 L.Ed.2d 802 (1980) (citing Blackie's "fraud-on-the-market" theory as applicable in actions brought under § 10b but not under § 18 of the SEA of 1934); Blackie, supra ; accord Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); cf. Fausett v. American Resources Management Corp., 542 F.Supp. 1234 (D.Utah 1982) (applying exception to actual reliance requirement in case involving short sales while simultaneously reject…
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 382 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hassett v. Zimmerman (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); McFarland v. Memorex Corp., 493 F.Supp. 631, 639 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Stromfield v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 484 F.Supp. 1264, 1270 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Ross v. Warner, 480 F.Supp. 268, 271 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
In that case, which also involved a precatory resolution, Judge Pollack held that because management would have been free to ignore the resolution regardless of whether it passed, the challenged proxy solicitation was not “an essential link in the accomplishment of some corporate action,” and the plaintiff therefore had not alleged the “transaction causation” essential to a 14(a) claim. 431 F.Supp. at 387 ; see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brayton v. Ostrau
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Ramada Inns Securities Litigation
See, for example, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.I974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975), where defendants engaged in a comprehensive scheme to defraud which included substantial collateral conduct in addition to misrepresentations and omissions in a proxy solicitation. 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Schneider v. Austin
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 378-9 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Mitchell Newman
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
See generally Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 478 F.2d 1281, 1301-03 (2d Cir. 1973) 7 In Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975), this court spoke of the need for "a showing of both loss causation that the misrepresentations or omissions caused the economic harm and transaction causation that the violations in question caused the appellant to engage in the transaction in question." In the instant case, as in Schlick, demonstration of the latter is the critical issue, as once this is done, the forme…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Corp. Securities Litigation
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Smillie v. Park Chemical Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 381-83 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weitzman v. Stein
Estate Counseling Service, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 303 F.2d 527, 533 (10th Or. 1962); see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Stone
See In re Marriage of Milhan, 13 Cal.3d 129 , 117 Cal.Rptr. 809 , 528 P.2d 1145 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975) (National Service Life Insurance Act); Thiede, The Community Property Interest of the Non-Employee Spouse in Private Employee Retirement Benefits, 9 U.S.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Kendrick
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Segal v. Gordon, 467 F.2d 602, 608 (2d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maldonado v. Flynn
Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375, 385 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 622 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970); see Schlick v. Penn.-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381-82, 383 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Goldberger v. Baker, 442 F.Supp. 659 (S.D.N.Y.1977); United States v. Fields, [Current] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
Kaye v. Pantone, Inc.
See generally, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo Omiya
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381-84 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Swanson v. American Consumers Industries, Inc., 475 F.2d 516, 520-21 (7th Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Schlansky v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Weinberger v. Kendrick, 432 F.Supp. at 320 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Hamilton International Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 405 F.2d 215, 218 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 906 , 89 S.Ct. 1747 , 23 L.Ed.2d 219 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Sisters of the Precious Blood, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors
“While the rule is relaxed as to matters peculiarly within the adverse parties' knowledge, the allegations must then be accompanied by a statement of facts upon which the belief is founded.” Id.; accord, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Rich v. Touche Ross & Co., supra at 245.
cited
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Kendrick
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Billet v. Storage Technology Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 382-84 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felipe Cervantes
(2×)
A motion for a new trial upon the basis of newly discovered evidence must meet the following requirements: “(1) It must appear from the motion that the evidence relied on is, in fact, newly discovered, i. e., discovered after the trial; (2) the motion must allege facts from which the court may infer diligence on the part of the movant; (3) the evidence relied on must not be merely cumulative or impeaching; (4) must be material to the issues involved; and (5) must be such as, on a new trial, would probably produce an acquittal.” Pitts v. United States, 263 F.2d 808, 810 (9th Cir.), cert. de…
cited
Cited "see"
Rich v. Touche Ross & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir. *99 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tanzer v. Haynie
See Heyman v. Heyman, 356 F.Supp. 958, 967-68 (S.D.N.Y.1973), cited and quoted approvingly in Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 382 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U. S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LaSalle National Bank v. Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co.
See, e.g., Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Lehman Broth *1088 ers Commercial Corp. v. Minmetals Int’l Non-Ferrous Metals Trading Co., 94 Civ. 8301, 1995 WL 608323 at *3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramsay v. G.C. Evans Sales & Manufacturing Co.
Leasing Services, Inc., 32 B.R. 199, 203 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1983); see also Schlick v. Penn Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Davidson v. Bank of New England (In re Hollis and Company), 86 B.R. 152, 156 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scholnick v. Schecter
See also Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975) (noting that loss causation “is demonstrated rather easily by proof of some form of economic damage”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Phillips Petroleum Securities Litigation
Defendants urge that transaction causation is but “one aspect of the ubiquitous requirement that losses be causally related to the defendant’s wrongful acts.” Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 186 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); see also Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975) (appellant required to establish loss causation where a presumption of reliance established transaction causation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Seagoing Uniform Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.
See e.g., Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 *933 U.S. 976, 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rankow v. First Chicago Corp.
Kademian v. Ladish Co., 792 F.2d 614 , 628 n. 11 (7th Cir. 1986); see also Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 1 Such causation will be satisfied “only if the misrepresentation touches upon the reasons for the investment’s decline in value.” Huddleston v. Herman & MacLean, 640 F.2d 534, 549 (5th Cir.1981), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 459 U.S. 375 , 103 S.Ct. 683 , 74 L.Ed.2d 548 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trujillo-Hernandez
v.
Farrell, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Farrell, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 74-6000.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
May 19, 1975.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.