green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lynnwell Smith v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
(2×)
But see Brooks v. Perini, N.D.Ohio, 1973, 384 F.Supp. 1011 , aff’d, 6 Cir., 1974, 497 F.2d 923 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (Miranda violation “constitutionally compelled” reversal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hmc Management Corporation, D/B/A the Louisiana Superdome v. Carpenters District Council of New Orleans and Vicinity, and Carpenters Local No. 1846, Carpenters District Council of New Orleans and Vicinity, and Carpenters Local No. 1846 v. Hmc Management Corporation, D/B/A the Louisiana Superdome
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731-732 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974)." 19 Even assuming, however, that the arbitrator's award in this case is inadequate in establishing a nexus between the discriminatory reinstatement and the just cause standard for discipline, the panel oversteps the proper bounds of the restricted review of labor arbitration awards.
discussed
Cited "see"
HMC Management Corp. v. Carpenters District Council of New Orleans & Vicinity
See United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731-732 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974).” Even assuming, however, that the arbitrator’s award in this case is inadequate in establishing a nexus between the discriminatory reinstatement and the just cause standard for discipline, the panel oversteps the proper bounds of the restricted review of labor arbitration awards.
discussed
Cited "see"
Iron Workers Local v. Bowen
See n.3, supra 18 We note that General Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc., 560 F.2d 700 , 707-08 n.8 (5th Cir.), rev'd en banc on other grounds, 579 F.2d 1282 (1978), cert. denied, 443 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 3103 , 61 L.Ed. 877 (1979) (citing United Steel Workers of America v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 732 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974)), suggests that "disputes over the scope of a submission are themselves to be resolved by the arbitrator." But since in this case the court's construction of the issue submitted wa…
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Construction, Inc. v. Oregon-Southern Idaho & Wyoming District Council of Laborers & Laborers Local Union 267
International Association of Machinists v. Texas Steel Co., 538 F.2d 1116,1121 (5th Cir. 1976); see United Steelworkers of America v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731-32 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Const., Inc. v. OREGON-SOUTHERN IDAHO, ETC.
International Association of Machinists v. Texas Steel Co., 538 F.2d 1116, 1121 (5th Cir.1976); see United Steelworkers of America v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731-32 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
District 28, United Mine Workers of America, Inc. v. Wellmore Coal Corporation
See Tucker v. Maher, 497 F.2d 1309, 1313 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974), Rios v. Cessna Finance Corp., 488 F.2d 25, 28 (10th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee for United Farm Workers v. Nottingham Liquors, Ltd.
(2×)
See Tucker v. Maher, 497 F.2d 1309, 1313-1316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974); Rios v. Cessna Fin.
cited
Cited "see"
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, District 776, Cross v. Texas Steel Company, Cross
See United Steelworkers v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731-32 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. National Football League
N.L.R.B. v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 531 F.2d 424, 427 (9th Cir.1976) (citing Aroyo v. United States, 359 U.S. 419 , 79 S.Ct. 864 , 3 L.Ed.2d 915 (1959)); see also United Steelworkers v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 734 (5th Cir.) (“the purpose of [section] 302(a) is to protect employers from extortion and to insure honest uninfluenced representation of employees”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974). 7.28 The general prohibition is subject to express statutory exceptions set forth in section. 302(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186 (c).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 144, Hotel, Hosp., Nur. Home & Allied Serv. v. Amer. Nur. H.
See, e.g., United Steelworkers v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 734 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974); Local 1115 v. B & K Inv., Inc., 100 L.R.R.M. 2174 , 2177 (S.D.N.Y.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. State
See also Booze v. State, 291 So.2d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied 297 So.2d 836 (Fla.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John R. Loveless, Claude W. Bowman & John P. Hall v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Charles G. Dyer, S. T. Belastock and George Smith
See, e.g., United Steelworkers v. United States Gypsum Co., 492 F.2d 713, 731 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 312 , 42 L.Ed.2d 271 (1974) (citing Holly Sugar as correct statement of the law); Dallas Typographical Union No. 173 v. A.H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perini, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Brooks
v.
Brooks
No. 74-249.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.