Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp., 419 U.S. 1057 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp., 419 U.S. 1057 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mockaitis v. Harcleroad (ord, 1996-08-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mockaitis v. Harcleroad
D. Or. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Vigorito, 499 F.2d 1351 (2d Cir.) (no standing for persons, whose conversations were overheard pursuant to court-ordered electronic surveillance, to seek section 2515 exclusion when they were not criminal defendants or grand jury witnesses), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1056 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1974).
cited Cited "see" In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Hialeah Knitting Mills, Inc., Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Universal Textured Yarns, Inc., and G. Allen Mebane, Individually, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Concordia Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Paul O. Boghossian, Jr., Individually, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc., Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Gold Mills, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See, In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 498 F.2d 271 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1057 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See, In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 498 F.2d 271 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1057 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Stearns v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 669 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir.1982) (“ ‘[Reduction to practice’ includes not only [the] reduction of [an idea] to reality but also sufficient testing or experimentation to demonstrate that the device as it exists possesses sufficient utility, i.e., that the invention is suitable for its intended purposes.”) (original emphasis), citing, In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 498 F.2d 271, 280 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1057 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1974); Boyce v. Anderson, supra, at 820. 12.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Watts v. University of Delaware
D. Del. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 498 F.2d 271, 278-85 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1057 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1974); Cali v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 442 F.2d 65, 70-71 (1971); Aerovox Corp. v. Polymet Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sauquoit Fibers Co., Inc.
v.
Leesona Corp.
No. 74-447.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1974.
419 U.S. 1057
Certiorari.
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.