green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“the character or nature of 'interest' cannot be changed by calling it 'damages,' 'loss,' 'earned increment,' 'just compensation,' 'discount,' 'offset,' or 'penalty,' or any other term, because it is still interest and the no-interest rule applies to it”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tommy Shaw v. Library of Congress
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the character or nature of 'interest' cannot be changed by calling it 'damages,' 'loss,' 'earned increment,' 'just compensation,' 'discount,' 'offset,' or 'penalty,' or any other term, because it is still interest and the no-interest rule applies to it
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Burns Martanette Alexander Gregory Eugene August Earline Montgomery, United States of America v. Gregory Eugene August
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1165 (7th Cir.1975) (“it is well established that an agent cannot be insulated from criminal liability by the fact that his principal authorized his conduct”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Yager v. Carey
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Talbot v. Robert Matthews Distributing Co.
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Talbot v. Robert Matthews Distributing Company
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
ITT Corp. v. United States
See United States v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 207 Ct.Cl. 369 , 518 F.2d 1309, 1316 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvarado Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.
See, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Mertens v. Abbott Laboratories, 99 F.R.D. 38, 43 (D.N.H.1983); In re Three Mile Island Litigation, 87 F.R.D. 433 (M.D.Pa.1980); Marchesi v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 500, 501 (E.D.N.Y.1975); Wright v. McMann, 321 *1186 F.Supp. 127, 137 (N.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd in part and reversed in part on other grounds, 460 F.2d 126 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 885 , 93 S.Ct. 115 , 34 L.Ed.2d 141 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Employers Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U.S. District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Abramovitz v. Ahern, 97 F.R.D. at 215 and cases therein cited.
cited
Cited "see"
Northern Paiute Nation v. United States
See generally United States v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 207 Ct.Cl. 369 , 518 F.2d 1309 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Leigh v. Engle
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1167 (7th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (allowing repayment for legal fees only if defendants prevail).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Jackson
See In re Victor Technologies Securities Litigation, 102 F.R.D. 53 (N.D.Cal.1984), following McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1165 (7 Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Lester Harris, United States of America v. Dennis Warren, United States of America v. Richard Warren, United States of America v. Richard Warren
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1165 (7 Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abramovitz v. Ahern
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083, 1085-86 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Landau v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 367 F.Supp. 992, 997 (S.D.N.Y.1973); Tober v. Charnita, Inc., 58 F.R.D. 74, 81 (M.D.Pa.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Peter Johnson
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485h(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power). 25 Any modification of the preference, in view of its long history and clear reaffirmation in the Act, should be explicit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Johnson
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485h(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Johnson
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485 (h)(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Peter Johnson
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
City of Anaheim v. Duncan
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), for an exhaustive discussion of these projects.
cited
Cited "see"
City of Anaheim, California v. Duncan
See Arizona Power Pooling Association v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), for an exhaustive discussion of these projects.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
Kennedy); see McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); they did not contemplate giving free rein, through the device of authorization, in the use of union funds for the personal benefit of union officers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
Kennedy); see McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); they did not contemplate giving free rein, through the device of authorization, in the use of union funds for the personal benefit of union officers. 8 Analysis of the special labor context reenforces this view of the congressional purpose.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Duncan
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Arizona Power Pooling Ass’n v. Morton, 527 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
See Cox, Internal Affairs of Labor Unions Under the Labor Reform Act of 1959, 58 Mich.L.Rev. 819 (1960).” McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gabauer v. Woodcock
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) 1 Although treated as a summary judgment because matters outside the pleadings were considered, Count II was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
cited
Cited "see"
Gabauer v. Woodcock
See McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local No. 48, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
See, e.g., McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Head v. Brotherhood of Railway Workers, Etc., 512 F.2d 398 , *1058 400-01 (2d Cir.1975); Gurton, 339 F.2d at 375 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See Morrissey v. Segal, 526 F.2d at 127 (“[U]nion officials charged with breach of fiduciary duties were properly enjoined from expending union funds for *437 their personal defense prior to a full determination on the merits.”) (collecting cases); see also McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1167 (7th Cir.1975) (“[U]nion officials charged as defendants ... should retain independent counsel and bear the financial burden of their defense.”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Milone v. English, 306 F.2d at 817 (“As a general proposition we think funds…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stu Adams-Lundy v. The Association of Professional Flight Attendants
See, e.g., McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir.1975) (”[I]t is apparent that a demand for relief would have been futile ... [and] plaintiffs’ failure to make such a request is excused.’’), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Sabolsky, 457 F.2d at 1253 (“[SJtrict use of any exhaustion requirement would not be warranted ... [because] a request to sue would have been an exercise in futility.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel P. Quinn v. Joseph L. Digiulian, Jr.
See also McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1162 (7th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (failure to make demand on International excused where it would have been futile and when demand made on Local); Sabolsky v. Budzanoski, 457 F.2d 1245, 1252 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 853 , 93 S.Ct. 65 , 34 L.Ed.2d 96 (1972) (letter requesting internal relief sufficient under circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Melanie Hanson Johnson and Gerard Stanley Johnson, in Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Jacqueline N. Rau
(2×)
See, e.g., McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U. S. District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 , 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Esler v. Northrup Corp., 86 F.R.D. 20, 38 (W.D.Mo.1979); 7A Wright & Miller, Fed.Prac. & Proc.: Civil, § 1773 at 9 (1972) Although the district court's reliance on Rule 23 (b)(1)(A) was misplaced, its class certification was nonetheless appropriate.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henry P. Carr v. Israel Learner
See also McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157, 1163 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Head v. BRAC, 512 F.2d 398,400-01 (2d Cir. 1975) (reaffirming the rule of the Gurton case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McNamara
v.
Johnston
v.
Johnston
No. 75-920.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.