green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949-50 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (to make out a claim for restitution "it is usually necessary for the plaintiff to show that he conferred the benefit").
discussed
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949-50 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (to make out a claim for restitution “it is usually necessary for the plaintiff to show that he conferred the benefit”).
cited
Cited "see"
Unidisco, Inc. v. Schattner
Accord Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Unidisco, Inc. v. Robert I. Schattner, D/B/A \The Sporicidin Company
Accord Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976). 18 As in Proxmire, though perhaps to a lesser degree, Schattner's unfair competition claim probes the outer reaches of the tort.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Combustion, Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 285 & n.4, 521 F.2d 941 , 945 & n.4 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Northeast Construction Co. v. Romney, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 381, 388-89 , 485 F.2d 752 , 759-60 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Technology for Communications International, Inc. v. Garrett
See also Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941 , 946 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Kentron Hawaii, Limited v. Warner, 480 F.2d 1166 , 1169 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Dilger
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Gowdy v. United States, 412 F.2d 525 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 960 , 90 S.Ct. 437 , 24 L.Ed.2d 425 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Breck v. Ulmer
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (discretionary function exception applies where contracting officer’s obligation not purely ministerial, notwithstanding possible abuse of discretion in ignoring bidding regulations); Lipka v. United States, 249 F.Supp. 213, 216 (N.D.N.Y.1965), aff'd on other grounds, 369 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.1966), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 935 , 87 S.Ct. 2061 , 18 L.Ed.2d 997 (1967) (“The award of a contract by government officials is the exercise of a discretionary fu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South African Marine Corp., Ltd. v. United States
See also Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941 (2nd Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (continuation of suit by original plaintiff/owner allowed after improper assignment rescinded and claim reverted to original owner).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuszak
See also In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Worobyzt), 522 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Droback v. United States, 509 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 964 , 95 S.Ct. 1952 , 44 L.Ed.2d 450 (1975); In re Vigori *618 to, 499 F.2d 1351 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1056 , 95 S.Ct. 640 , 42 L.Ed.2d 654 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cargill, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 521 F.2d 941, 947 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (FAA misrepresented that it would accept the most competitive bid on defense contract); Redmond v. SEC, 518 F.2d 811 , 814-815 (7th Cir. 1975) (misrepresentation by government respecting honesty of a securities dealer); Fitch v. United States, 513 F.2d 1013, 1016 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 866 , 96 S.Ct. 127 , 46 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975) (wrongful misrepresentation of obligation to enter armed forces); Reamer v. United States, 45…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scanwell Laboratories, Inc.
v.
Thomas, Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
v.
Thomas, Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
No. 75-1028.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1976.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.