green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Nieves-Burgos
See United States v. Moynagh, 566 F.2d 799, 804 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 917 , 98 S.Ct. 1475 , 55 L.Ed.2d 510 (1978) (citing United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976) (citing Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 , 77 S.Ct. 1064 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1356 )) (“We conclude that Moynagh’s conviction on these counts cannot be sustained because each count contains a specification charging concealment ... and no evidence, was introduced which supports any fraudulent concealment. ... ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nieves Burgos
See United States v. Moynagh, 566 F.2d 799 , _____________ _______ 804 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 917 (1978) (citing ____ ______ United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. _____________ _______ ____ denied, 425 U.S. 934 (1976) (citing Yates v. United States, 354 ______ _____ _____________ U.S. 298)) ("We conclude that Moynagh's conviction on these counts cannot be sustained because each count contains a specification charging concealment . . . and no evidence was introduced which supports any fraudulent concealment . . . .").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nieves Burgos
See United States v. Moynagh, 566 F.2d 799, 804 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 917 (1978) (citing United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 (1976) (citing Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 )) ("We conclude that Moynagh's conviction on these counts cannot be sustained because each count contains a specification charging concealment . . . and no evidence was introduced which supports any fraudulent concealment . . . .").
cited
Cited "see"
Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.
See Bronson v. Board of Educ., 525 F.2d 344, 349 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1655 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Bronson v. Board of Education, Etc., 525 F.2d 344, 349 (6th Cir. 1975) cert. denied 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1665 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976) (collateral estoppel not to be rigidly applied to result in manifest injustice) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976). 4 If each alternative ground for a defendant’s first-degree murder conviction is supported by substantial evidence, we will not set aside the conviction solely because we are unable to determine which ground served as the basis for the jury’s decision.
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Bluefield v. Crawford
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); 12 Bonhiver v. Graff, supra. In answering this certified question, we do not express an opinion on the underlying merits of the claim.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Perlmutter
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 318 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District
(2×)
See Bronson v. Board of Education, 525 F.2d 344, 350 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1665 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
See Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati (“Bronson I”), 525 F.2d 344 (6th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1665 , 48 L.Ed. 175 (1976); Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati (“Bronson II”), 687 F.2d 836 (6th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
The United States of America v. James Dean Barton
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1982
Reg. 2d 843 (1969) (coverage of Poor People's Campaign allegedly slanted and staged); Radio Station WSNT, Inc. 27 F.C.C.2d 993 (1971) (failure to cover Black organization's activities); Time-Life Broadcast, Inc. (KOGO-TV), 33 F.C.C.2d 1050 (1972) (allegations of "Anglo bias" in the news); Hunger in America, 20 F.C.C.2d 143 (1969) (documentary allegedly misleading and staged); Lincoln County Broadcasters, Inc., 51 F.C.C.2d 65 (1975) (broadcast critical of zoning decision for political reasons) 36 Indeed in Alabama Educational Television Commission, 50 F.C.C.2d 461 (1975) the FCC denied AETC's l…
cited
Cited "see"
Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission
See Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 521 F.2d 288 , 291 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976). .
cited
Cited "see"
Massachusetts Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. Harris
See Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. EPA, 523 F.2d 16 , 19 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Board of Education
See Bronson v. Board of Education, 525 F.2d 344 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1665 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Community-Service Broadcasting of Mid-America, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
(2×)
See Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 196 , 521 F.2d 288 , 296 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DePalma
See United States v. Ruyle, 524 F.2d 1133, 1136 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976) (defendant not entitled to challenge indictment “on the ground that information which he considered favorable to his defense was not presented to the grand jury”).
cited
Cited "see"
American Medicorp, Inc. v. Humana, Inc.
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Brecht
See United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 328 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Douglas C.
As I discuss hereinafter, the duplicity framework that the majority has adopted largely tracks the approach followed by the Fifth Circuit. 3 Under the Second Circuit approach, specific unanimity instructions gen- erally are not required; see, e.g., United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S. Ct. 1663 , 48 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Douglas C. (Concurrence)
As I discuss hereinafter, the duplicity framework that the majority has adopted largely tracks the approach followed by the Fifth Circuit. 3 Under the Second Circuit approach, specific unanimity instructions gen- erally are not required; see, e.g., United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S. Ct. 1663 , 48 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Ramos
See also United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 324-325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 (1976); United States v. Gipson, 553 F.2d 453, 458-459 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Peterson, 768 F.2d 64, 66-68 (2d Cir. 1985); People v. Forbes, 175 Cal. App. 3d 807, 816 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Crowley
See, e.g., People v. Harris, 15 Cal. 3d 384 (1975) (ordinarily there exist less intrusive and more reasonable alternatives to prearrest transportation), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 (1976); State v. Crowder, 1 Haw.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Naylor v. Lee's Summit Reorganized School District R-7
See, e.g., Bronson v. Board of Education, 525 F.2d 344 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom., Ohio State Board of Education v. Bronson, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1665 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Lloyd Phillips
(2×)
In the absence of an appropriate unanimity instruction tendered by the defendant ], we will not reverse the convictions on the ground of faulty instruction.” Williams, 737 F.2d at 614 (citing United States v. Pavloski, 574 F.2d 933, 936 (7th Cir.1978)); see also United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 324-25 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davis
See, e.g., United States v. Ruyle, 524 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission
The doctrine, which “originally evolved under the authority of general provisions of the [Act] calling for regulation in the ‘public interest,’ ... has since received explicit statutory recognition, in the 1959 amendment.” Straus Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 530 F.2d 1001 , 1007 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1976) (Wright, J., for a unanimous court); see also Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 521 F.2d 288 , 296 n. 34 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); Brandywine-Main Line Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 473 F.2d 16 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Telecommunications Research And Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission
The doctrine, which "originally evolved under the authority of general provisions of the [Act] calling for regulation in the 'public interest,' ... has since received explicit statutory recognition, in the 1959 amendment." Straus Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 530 F.2d 1001 , 1007 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1976) (Wright, J., for a unanimous court); see also Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 521 F.2d 288 , 296 n. 34 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); Brandywine-Main Line Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 473 F.2d 16 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 922 , 93 S.Ct. 2731 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lemar
See also United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 324-325 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 934 (1976); United States v. Cunningham, 723 F.2d 217, 227 (2d Cir. 1983), cert, denied, 466 U.S. 951 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seedkem, Inc. v. Safranek
Inc. v. Berman, 423 F.Supp. 275 , 310 n. 60 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff’d in part, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir. 1977); see also United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 320-21 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Davis
(See In re Tony C., supra, at pp. 892-893; see also People v. Harris (1975) 15 Cal.3d 384, 388-389 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 536 , 540 P.2d 632 ] [cert, den., 425 U.S. 934 ( 48 L.Ed.2d 175 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 )]; People v. Flores (1974) 12 Cal.3d 85, 91 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 225 , 524 P.2d 353 ]; People v. Gale (1973) 9 Cal.3d 788, 797-798 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 852 , 511 P.2d 1204 ]; Irwin v. Superior Court (1969) 1 Cal.3d 423, 426-427 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 484 , 462 P.2d 12 ]; People v. Moore (1968) 69 Cal.2d 674, 682-683 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 800 , 446 P.2d 800 ] [overruled on other grounds, People v. Thomas, 19 Cal.3d 630, 641 ( …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters Local No. 638
See also UTU, Local 974 v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co., 532 F.2d 336 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
Big Rivers Electric Corp.
v.
Environmental Protection Agency and Tennessee Valley Authority v. Environmental Protection Agency
v.
Environmental Protection Agency and Tennessee Valley Authority v. Environmental Protection Agency
No. 75-774; No. 75-787.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1976.
425 U.S. 934
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 523 F. 2d 16.