green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Golding v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cameron v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 725-26 (concluding Navy could rightly find plaintiffs absence was not unavoidable even though Mexican detention for drug trafficking may have been based upon a confession extracted by torture), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.) (in reviewing agency action under the APA, "the focal point for judicial review should be the administrative record already in existence, not some new record made initially in the reviewing court." (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); Lewis, 998 F.2d at 882 ("Judicial review under these standards is generally based on the administrative record that was before the agency at the tim…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.) (in reviewing agency action under the APA, “the focal point for judicial review should be the administrative record already in existence, not some new record made initially in the reviewing court.” (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); Lewis, 998 F.2d at 882 (“Judicial review under these standards is generally based on the administrative record that was before the agency at t…
discussed
Cited "see"
LTV Steel Co. v. Shalala
See Gentry v. United States, 546 F.2d 343, 355 (Cl.Ct.1976) (“Our authority to issue a declaratory judgment is limited_ We are authorized to do so only where ‘it is tied and subordinate to a monetary award.’ ”) (quoting Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975)); Kennedy v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 69, 75 (Cl.Ct.1989) (dismissal is required where the relief sought is other than monetary compensation).
cited
Cited "see"
Martinez v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Sargent v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ocelia M. Perkins Donald J. McQueen Joyce Scott Pamela H. Williams Anders Migdaleck and Stella H. Ware
See United States v. Vigi, 515 F.2d 290 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 (1975). 26 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1025 (4th Cir.) (suggesting that a review limited to the form of an EIS is inadequate under NEPA), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 *557 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jagnandan v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 724 (court lacks jurisdiction to entertain claim for pay and allowances beyond term of enlistment), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wales v. United States
See Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 404 , 296 F.2d 226 (1960) (discharge invalid due to gross procedural and constitutional defect, but relief limited to end of then-current enlistment), explained in Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723-24 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
See DeFillipo v. Ford Motor Corp., 516 F.2d 1313, 1318 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Farms v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spartan Grain & Mill Company, Cross-Appellee v. Virgil Ayers, W.C. Meaders, Jr., Boyce Blackmon, and Joe Acker, Cross-Appellants
Since judgment should have been entered for Spartan, the producers’ attorney’s fees award must be reversed. 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 ; See De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313, 1321 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Opalack v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
University of Maryland v. Cleland
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.), cert. den., 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flowers v. United States
Unless a statute or regulation confers upon a serviceperson the right to reenlist, “an enlisted man has no right to reenlist when his previous enlistment period ends____” McEniry v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 622, 626 (1985) (citing Thompson v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 983, 983-84 , 1979 WL 10425 (1979)); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , 1975 WL 22844 (1975) (stating that the United States Court of Claims has “consistently held that since ... servicemen have no right to reenlist at the expiration of their current enlistments, the United States has undertaken to pay t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bates v. United States
Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 781 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 365 , 102 L.Ed.2d 355 (1988); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975) (no power to grant affirmative non-monetary relief in military pay case unless it is tied and subordinate to a monetary award)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jo-Ann, Inc. v. Alfin Fragrances, Inc.
Co., 571 S.W.2d 640, 642 (Ky.App.1978); see, e.g., DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3rd Cir.) (interpreting the Pennsylvania version of the code), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); and Cavalier Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Liberty Homes, Inc., 53 Md.App. 379, 394 , 454 A.2d 367 (1983), as well as Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 594 F.2d 129, 134 (1979) (Wisdom, J.) (applying Iowa law) (citing Rockwell Eng’g Co. v. Automatic Timing & Controls Co., 559 F.2d 460 (7th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 938 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 198 (1979)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffin v. United States
United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 397-98 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 952-53 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); see United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3-4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bascom Food Products Corp. v. Reese Finer Foods, Inc.
They have not been saved by allegations that they were reasonable in the specific circumstances, nor by a failure to show that they “fixed or regulated prices, parcelled out or limited production, or brought about a deterioration in quality.” Id. at 212, 79 S.Ct. at 709; see also DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975) (defining a per se illegal group boycott as one in which there is a “purpose either to exclude a person or group from the market, or to accomplish some other anticompetitive objective, or both.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amoco Production Company v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Department of the Interior, Defendants
See, e.g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 (declaratory judgments that are "tied and subordinate to a monetary award"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 1507 (actions under § 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitmer v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.
Compare Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting Corp., supra, 451 Pa. at 422-424 , 305 A.2d at 696 , and DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313, 1322-23 (3rd Cir.1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements Litigation
See also, DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1980
See, e. g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975); Neal v. Secretary of the Navy, supra, 472 F.Supp. at 781-85 ; Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312, 314 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beller v. Middendorf
See, e. g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975); Neal v. Secretary of the Navy, supra, 472 F.Supp. at 781-85 ; Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312, 314 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dorothy R. Garber
(2×)
See, e. g., Haverly v. United States, 513 F.2d 224 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Timothy W. Swain and Katherine A. Swain v. Claude S. Brinegar, Individually and as Secretary of Transportation for the United States
(2×)
This aspect of the EIS therefore meets the standards set forth in Sierra Club v. Froehlke, 486 F.2d 946, 952-953 (7th Cir. 1973); see also Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1027-1028 (4th Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 ; Daly v. Volpe, 514 F.2d 1106, 1111-1112 (9th Cir. 1975); Iowa Citizens for Environmental Quality, Inc. v. Volpe, 487 F.2d 849, 851-853 (8th Cir. 1973).
Stanley
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
No. 74-6718.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1975.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.