green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1978 ·
…a contemporaneous search of containers in the vehicle which could reasonably be employed in the illicit carriage of contraband is also constitutionally permissible.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Regan
an indictment need do little more than to track the language of the statute charged and state the time and place (in approximate terms) of the alleged crime
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hernandez
the possession of large amounts of unexplained cash in connection with evidence of narcotics trafficking on a large scale is similar to the possession of special means, such as tools, or apparatus, which is admissible to show the doing of an act requiring those means.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Robert Charles Stevie, United States of America v. Raymond Lee Reynolds
(2×)
a contemporaneous search of containers in the vehicle which could reasonably be employed in the illicit carriage of contraband is also constitutionally permissible.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Quintana, 87 N.M. 414, 418 , 534 P.2d 1126, 1130 (Ct.App.) (evidence that defendant possessed over thirty caps of heroin but was not user of heroin was sufficient to support conclusion that defendant was trafficking in heroin), cert. denied, 88 N.M. 29 , 536 P.2d 1085 , and cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Maholias, A.K.A. Maria Rodriguez
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1106 (2d Cir.) (while evidence of narcotics sales by two organizations to a common distributor indicated two spheres of operation in the conspiracy that was established, there was sufficient proof of mutual dependence and assistance to warrant treatment of the two spheres as one general business venture), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfredo Diaz, Eradio Perez, and Jose Alfanso Riano
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1109 (2d Cir.) (possession and removal from residence of $960,000 probative of illicit activity), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 55, 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); see also United States v. Mabry, 809 F.2d 671, 687 (10th Cir.) (large amount of unexplained cash probative of state of mind and intent in the context of a narcotics distribution scheme), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 33 , 98 L.Ed.2d 164 (1987); United States v. Bernal, 719 F.2d 1475, 1478 (9th Cir.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
William H. Hinton v. The Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
See Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 , 98 S.Ct. 2454, 2457 , 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978); accord Metex Corp., 748 F.2d at 153 ; see Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Frank Gaggi, Henry Borelli, Peter Lafroscia, Ronald Ustica, Edward Rendini and Ronald Turekian
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1118 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975) (co-conspirator’s murder admissible as evidence of the means taken in furtherance of conspiracy goals.).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Doe
See State v. Quintana, 87 N.M. 414 , 534 P.2d 1126 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 88 N.M. 29 , 536 P.2d 1085 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Grant v. Abrams
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Domingo v. New England Fish Co.
See Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 156, 163 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 584, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,253 Nemesio D. Domingo, Jr. Samuel Cabansag, Jr. Joseph C. Ancheta Thomas G. Carpenter and Terri Jane Mast, as Administrator of the Estate of Silme G. Domingo Nellie Kookesh Audrey A. Merculief Frank Paul Mary Paul Tony Evon, Sr. And Samuel Strauss, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. New England Fish Company, and Nefco Fidalgo Packing Co., Defendants- Appellees/cross-Appellants
See Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 156, 163 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shipp
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); see also United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 625 (2d Cir.1979) (outlining circumstances in which charge must be given regarding multiple conspiracies), cer t. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed .2d 795 (1980). 67 .
cited
Cited "see"
Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.
See Rogers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.
See Rogers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Cheyney State College Faculty v. Shirley Hufstedler
See Rodgers v. U.S. Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Cheyney State College Faculty v. Hufstedler
See Rodgers v. U.S. Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Flaherty, United States of America v. James R. Kearns, Jr., United States of America v. Stuart H. Wahl
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carla Jabara, John T. McClain Earl Moore, Ella Hood, Evelyn Hatch, Curtistine Rideout
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De La Zerda
See United States v. Gerry, 515 F.2d 130 (2d Cir., 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Tasby v. United States, 451 F.2d 394 (8th Cir., 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 992 , 92 S.Ct. 1262 , 31 L.Ed.2d 459 , 406 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 1787 , 32 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972); United States v. Fountain, 449 F.2d 629 (8th Cir., 1971) cert. denied, 405 U.S. 929 , 92 S.Ct. 981 , 30 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972); Trigg v. United States, 430 F.2d 372, 373 (7th Cir., 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 966 , 91 S.Ct. 379 , 27 L.Ed.2d 387 (1970); White v. United States, 415 F.2d 292 (5th Cir., 1969), …
discussed
Cited "see"
Gouldman v. Seligman & Latz of Houston, Inc.
See Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Coles v. Marsh, 560 F.2d 186 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 985 , 98 S.Ct. 611 , 54 L.Ed.2d 479 (1977); but see Waldo v. Lake-shore Estates, Inc., 433 F.Supp. 782 (E.D.La. 1977), appeal dismissed, 579 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1978).
examined
Cited "see"
19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1682, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,001 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil Company
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Rodgers v. United States Steel, 508 F.2d 152, 161 (CA3), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975): “The attorneys for the plaintiffs, with appropriate caution, declined to test an ambiguous order by violating it and risking contempt.” .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian Brown
(2×)
See generally United States v. Gerry, 515 F.2d 130, 143-44 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (use of transcripts upheld because trial judge had difficulty understanding them).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Charles Milhollan, A/K/A Alec Leroy Foltz
(2×)
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1104-05 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Issod, 508 F.2d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 1974), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct. 1578 , 43 L.Ed.2d 783 (1975); United States v. Soriano, 497 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1974) (en banc), Convictions summarily affirmed sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald E. Belle. Appeal of Donald Belle
(2×)
See United States v. Gerry, 515 F.2d 130 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Nelson v. Follette, 430 F.2d 1055, 1057 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 917 , 91 S.Ct. 899 , 27 L.Ed.2d 818 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Lee Hyde, Joseph Burtis Middlebrooks, Jr., Patricia Jean Middlebrooks, and Pedro Rocha Arenas, United States of America v. Joseph Burtis Middlebrooks, Patricia Jean Middlebrooks, and Pedro Rocha Arenas
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105-07 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Wilner, 523 F.2d 68 (2d Cir. 1975)
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto Tercero, United States of America v. Juan Antonio Tercero
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hyde
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105-07 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Wilner, 523 F.2d 68 (2d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William H. Hockridge, Charles Petri and Stephen K. Easton
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Jackskion, 102 F.2d 683, 684 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 635 , 59 S.Ct. 1032 , 83 L.Ed. 1517 (1939).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Currington
See United States v. Tramunti, 377 F.Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d in part, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Charles Finnegan
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1104-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Issod, 508 F.2d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct. 1578 , 43 L.Ed.2d 783 (1975); United States v. Soriano, 497 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1974) (eh banc). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.
(2×)
See Rodgers v. U. S. Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 162 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975). ("The district court [has] inherent discretionary authority to stay proceedings pending litigation in another proceeding.") [31] When and if the New *521 York matter goes to judgment against Copeland, this Court, upon application, will determine if the matter as actually litigated and resolved in the Southern District of New York constitutes a provable claim within the meaning of section 63 of the Bankruptcy Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Del Vecchio v. United States
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1094 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rev. Alberto Mejias, A/K/A Rev. Angel Ortiz
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1108-09 (2d Cir.), cert. den., 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256, 267-68 (2d Cir.), cert. den., 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kendall
See State v. Quintana, 87 N.M. 414 , 534 P.2d 1126 (Ct.App.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); State v. Santillanes, 86 N.M. 627 , 526 P.2d 424 (Ct.App.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Falcone and Joseph Curreri
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1113 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Salazar, 485 F.2d 1272, 1277 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 985 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 882 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Panebianco
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benny Ong
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 , 1106-07 n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Mallah, 503 F.2d 971, 980 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 995 , 95 S.Ct. 1425 , 43 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Grand Jury Empaneled January 21, 1975. Appeal of Joseph Curran
See Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 506 F.2d 355, 358-59 (3d Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip J. Gentile and Hunter B. Brashier
See United States v. Gerry, 515 F.2d 130 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); Tripp v. United States, 381 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alessi
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v: Bynum, 485 F.2d 490 (2d Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 417 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 2598 , 41 L.Ed.2d 209 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Bertolotti
(2×)
See United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Sperling, supra; United States v. Mallah, 503 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 995 , 95 S.Ct. 1425 , 43 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975); United States v. Bynum, 485 F.2d 490 (2d Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 417 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 2598 , 41 L.Ed.2d 209 (1974); United States v. Agueci, supra. Despite the existence of multiple groups within an alleged conspiracy, we have considered them as part of one integrated loose-knit combinat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jansen v. Monroe County
See, e.g., DeVonish, 19 F.3d at 109 (stating that the indictment need only “ ‘do little more than to track the language of the statute charged and state the time and place (in approximate terms) of the alleged crime’ ”) (quoting United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1113 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Robert Harrison
Although we have held that the existence of 'many separate transactions among various co-conspirators does not necessarily establish the existence of separate conspiracies, Dickey, 736 F.2d at 582 , we also have recognized that “[wjhere various parties conspire with one common conspirator, the evidence may nevertheless show that separate conspiracies were involved and that no one combination embraced the objectives of the others,” United States v. Martinez, 562 F.2d 633, 638 (10th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1106 (2d Cir.1975) (sale of narcotics by two org…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
See, e.g., Dolan, 725 F.2d at 1268 -69 (citing, inter alia, Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89 , 101 S.Ct. 2193 , 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981)); Vivone, 105 F.R.D. at 67 ; see also Rodgers v. U.S. Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152 , 163-65 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enver Calbas
“Parallel sales operations can be part of the same conspiracy if there is evidence of mutual dependence and support.” United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 453 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); see also United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1106 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francis Ditommaso A/K/A \Checco\"
Id.; see also United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1107-08 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lusardi v. Xerox Corporation
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). 8 "To come within the 'small class' of decisions excepted from the final-judgment rule by Cohen, the order must conclusively determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment." Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 , 98 S.Ct. 2454, 2458 , 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978); see also, Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
“To come within the ‘small class’ of decisions excepted from the final-judgment rule by Cohen , the order must conclusively determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 , 98 S.Ct. 2454, 2458 , 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978); see also, Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp., 508 F.2d 152, 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Ross, Jr.
See, e. g., United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1104-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Soriano, 497 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1974) (en banc); United States v. Evans, 481 F.2d 990, 993-94 (9th Cir. 1973). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas
v.
Day & Zimmermann, Inc.
v.
Day & Zimmermann, Inc.
No. 74-1489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2) · S.D. New York (2)
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.