green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mayo v. Sigler
That holding was followed by this court in Stassi v. Hogan, 395 F.Supp. 141 (N.D.Ga.1975), and by the Second and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals, Cardaropoli v. Norton, 523 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1975); Holmes v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 1243 (7th Cir. 1976); and see Raia v. Arnold, 405 F.Supp. 766 (M.D.Pa.1975); but see Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. den. - U.S. —, 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Keith A. Berg v. Larry Kincheloe
See generally Mar-chesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (1976); Lee v. Carlson, 564 F.Supp. 1048, 1053 (M.D.Pa.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Maschner
See Wolff, 418 U.S. at 571 , 94 S.Ct. at 2982 (existence of "a hazard of arbitrary decision making" may violate due process); see also Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.) (clear showing of abusive or capricious action in classifying prisoner as a "special offender" may violate due process), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (1976); Graham v. Willingham, 384 F.2d 367, 368 (10th Cir.1967) (prison discipline or segregation imposed in an arbitrary or capricious manner may support civil rights violation). 28 The existence of an improper motive for disciplini…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Maschner
See Wolff, 418 U.S. at 571 , 94 S.Ct. at 2982 (existence of “a hazard of arbitrary decision making” may violate due process); see also Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.) (clear showing of abusive or capricious action in classifying prisoner as a “special offender” may violate due process), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (1976); Graham v. Willingham, 384 F.2d 367, 368 (10th Cir. 1967) (prison discipline or segregation imposed in an arbitrary or capricious manner may support civil rights violation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murry v. State
See e. g., United States v. Taylor, (8th Cir. 1976) 530 F.2d 639 , cert. den. 429 U.S. 845 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (photographs taken by bank camera were admissible in federal bank robbery prosecution, even though all witnesses to robbery had been locked in safe before camera was activated, where government witnesses testified as to manner in which film was installed, way in which camera was activated, and chain of possession of film after robbery).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smaldone v. United States
See also, Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459, 461 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Wolfish v. Levi
See, e. g., Marchesani v. McCune, 531 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 127 , 50 L.Ed.2d 117 (1976); Royal v. Clark, 447 F.2d 501 , 502 (5th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marchesani
v.
McCune, Warden
v.
McCune, Warden
No. 75-6796.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.