green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States
(2×)
See 49 U.S.C. §§ 11901 , 11906. 13 As one court explained, “because of the importance of uninterrupted rail transportation service in the nation’s economy, Congress has expressed a clear intent, even to the point of criminal sanctions, that abandonments without prior ICC approval are not tolerated.” I.C.C. v. Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company, 398 F.Supp. 454, 464 (D.Md.1975), aff'd 537 F.2d 77 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Alco Gravure, Inc. v. Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DES Cases
See Bernhard v. Harrah's Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215 , 546 P.2d 719 (en banc) (adopting "comparative impairment of state interests" approach to choice-of-law issues), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashley v. Abbott Laboratories
See Bernhard v. Hurrah’s Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215 , 546 P.2d 719 (en banc) (adopting “comparative impairment of state interests” approach to choice-of-law issues), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thoring v. Bottonsek
See Blamey v. Brown, 270 N.W.2d 884 (Minn.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1070 , 100 S.Ct. 1013 , 62 L.Ed.2d 751 (1980), and Bernhard v. Harrah’s Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 546 P.2d 719 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company
See Bernhard v. Harrah's Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 546 P.2d 719, 722 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215, 218 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976); Reese, American Trends in Private International Law: Academic and Judicial Manipulation of Choice of Law Rules in Tort Cases, 33 Vand.L.Rev. 717, 720 (1980); Brilmayer, Interest Analysis and the Myth of Legislative Intent, 78 Mich.L.Rev. 392, 392-93 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.
See Bernhard v. Harrah’s Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 546 P.2d 719, 722 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215, 218 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976); Reese, American Trends in Private International Law: Academic and Judicial Manipulation of Choice of Law Rules in Tort Cases, 33 Vand.L.Rev. 717, 720 (1980); Brilmayer, Interest Analysis and the Myth of Legislative Intent, 78 Mich.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estrada v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
See, e.g., Bernhard v. Harrah's Club, 16 Cal.3d 313 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 215 , 546 P.2d 719 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 859 , 97 S.Ct. 159 , *1362 50 L.Ed.2d 136 (1976) (resolving what, at first glance, appear to be true conflicts).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bourgeois
v.
Seafarers Pension Plan, aka Seafarers Welfare Plan
v.
Seafarers Pension Plan, aka Seafarers Welfare Plan
No. 76-54.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.