green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“the introduction into evidence of a search warrant is for the sole purpose of demonstrating that the search was lawful, as distinguished from unlawful. it has no probative value in establishing the guilt of the accused.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
McCrary v. State
the introduction into evidence of a search warrant is for the sole purpose of demonstrating that the search was lawful, as distinguished from unlawful. it has no probative value in establishing the guilt of the accused.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Stillwell
Similarly, in FERC v. Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742, 755 , 102 S.Ct. 2126, 2135 , 72 L.Ed.2d 532 (1982), an action brought under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, the Court observed that Congress had made a specific finding that the regulation of certain utilities had “an immediate effect on interstate commerce.” Similarly, in Scarborough, 431 U.S. at 571, 97 S.Ct. at 1967, the Court noted that “Congress expressly declared that ‘the receipt, possession, or transportation of a firearm by felons ... constitutes ... a burden on commerce or threat affecting the free flow of c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephens v. American Home Assurance Co.
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955, 958 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977) (applying Kentucky law); Horowitz v. Southwest Forest Indus., Inc., 612 F.Supp. 179 (D.Nev.1985) (matters peculiar to relationship among corporation are internal affairs of corporation and governed by law of state of incorporation); United States v. Daugherty, 599 F.Supp. 671, 673 (E.D.Tenn.1984) (piercing corporate veil must be determined with reference to law of state of incorporation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarence Craig and Duveen A. Craig v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. v. Charter Consolidated P.L.C., Charter Consolidated Investments P.L.C., Central Mining Finance Ltd., Charter Consolidated Services Ltd., British South Africa Company, Consolidated Mines Selection Co., Ltd. Appeal of Charter Consolidated P.L.C., Charter Consolidated Investments P.L.C., Central Mining Finance Limited, Charter Consolidated Services Ltd., British South Africa Company, and Consolidated Mines Selection Committee Limited (Collectively \Charter\")"
(2×)
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955, 959 (6th Cir.1976) (decision to disregard corporate separateness is subject to plenary review), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977). 13 Thus, our review of the district court's conclusion that the relationship between Charter and Cape satisfied the standard under New Jersey law for piercing the corporate veil is plenary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Craig v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.
(2×)
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955, 959 (6th Cir.1976) (decision to disregard corporate separateness is subject to plenary review), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benny G. Shriver
See United States v. Sweet, 548 F.2d 198, 202 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Muza
See United States v. Sweet, 548 F.2d 198, 202 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pitts v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955, 958 (6th Cir.1976) cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977) (applying Kentucky law); Louisville Gas Co. v. Kaufman, Straus & Co., 105 Ky. 131 , 48 S.W. 434, 449 (1898).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Panelfab Puerto Rico, Inc.
Accord, Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955, 959 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969, 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell
See United States v. Sweet, 548 F.2d 198, 201 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977) (suggesting that the statute reaches the bombing of a tavern selling only home-produced liquor products because such activity reduces the demand for liquor goods sold in interstate commerce).
cited
Cited "see"
M. R. Godley v. Kentucky Resources Corporation, M. R. Godley v. Piedmont Land Sales, Inc., Hugh N. Rakes, J. E. Berry, Kentucky Resources Corporation, Clinton Coal Company and W. H. Goff, M. R. Godley v. Piedmont Land Sales, Inc., Hugh Rakes and Clinton Coal Company, Defendants
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Godley v. Kentucky Resources Corp.
See Poyner v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 542 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John H. Lomax
See also United States v. Sweet, 548 F.2d 198 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977); United States v. Mikelberg, 517 F.2d 246 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 909 , 96 S.Ct. 1104 , 47 L.Ed.2d 313 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles P. Grezo, Joseph T. D'agostino, Samuel L. Ebare, Richard Michael Beach
See, e. g., United States v. Turzitti, 547 F.2d 1003 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1653 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977); United States v. DiMuro, supra, 540 F.2d at 507-08 ; United States v. Bohn, 508 F.2d 1145 , 1149 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. *860 1676, 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); United States v. Guzek, supra, 527 F.2d 552 ; United States v. Brick, 502 F.2d 219, 221, 224-25 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. McHale, supra, 495 F.2d at 18 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neugent
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 76-1218.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.