green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Appellant .. . was informed on the record that if he wished, he could have an entirely new trial.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"Appellant ... was informed on the record that if he wished, he could have an entirely new trial."
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Landry
But see United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 975-76 (D.C.Cir.1976) ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976); United States v. Walk, 533 F.2d 417, 419 (9th Cir.).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alessandrello, Gaetano, in No. 79-2654. Appeal of Lacognata, Salvatore, in No. 79-2699
(2×)
appellant .. . was informed on the record that if he wished, he could have an entirely new trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)
See United States v. Flint, 534 F.2d 58, 60 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Klasing
(2×)
Klasing, at 792; see Alvarez v. State, 536 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 325 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976); Villareal v. State, 468 S.W.2d 837 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sturtz
See United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 970 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Purvis
See United States v. Leong, 536 F.2d 993, 997 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 325 , 50 L.Ed.2d 293 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Flaherty, United States of America v. James R. Kearns, Jr., United States of America v. Stuart H. Wahl
See United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 973 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976); United States v. Elmore, 423 F.2d 775, 779 (4th Cir. 1970); United States v. Deutsch, 373 F.Supp. 289, 290-91 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Penix
See United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Cortez v. State
Accord, Alvarez v. State, 536 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 325 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Falkowitz
See, e.g., United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 971 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976) (noting that a holding that actual loss to the victim would be required “would lead to the illogical result that the legality of defendant’s conduct would depend on his fortuitous choice of a gullible victim.”) By the same token, to allow a defendant to escape prosecution by holding that, as a matter of law, there is no specific intent to defraud in a case in which the only actual or potential victims duped by a particular device happen to be artless or imp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beckford
Inc. v. United States, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); see also United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 973 (D.C.Cir.) (“Disclosure by the government must allow the defense to use that favorable material effectively in the preparation and presentation of its case, even if satisfaction of this criterion requires pre-trial disclosure.”) (cit *786 ing United States v. Elmore, 423 F.2d 775, 779 (4th Cir.1970)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roland T. Butler, United States of America v. Norman C. Tillette, United States of America v. Augustine F. Barquin, United States of America v. C. Jimmie Vaccaro, Jr., United States of America v. Charles L. Clay
See, e.g., United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 970 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Butler
See, e.g., United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 970 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCorquodale v. Balkcom
See, e.g., Rini v. State, 236 Ga. 715 , 225 S.E.2d 234 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 326 , 50 L.Ed.2d 293 (1976); Gibson v. State, 160 Ga.App. 615 , 287 S.E.2d 595 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Carlson
See also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 532 F.2d 410 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976), where the court affirmed a civil contempt citation which suspended the running of the YCA sentence. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred \Freddy Campo\" Campagnuolo
See, e. g., United States v. Pollack, 1976, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 227 , 534 F.2d 964, 973-74 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 ; United States v. Houston, 1972, N.D.Ga., 339 F.Supp. 762, 764 ; Note, The Prosecutor’s Constitutional Duty to Reveal Evidence to the Defendant, 74 Yale L.J. 136 , 145 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Owens
v.
Sigler, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole
v.
Sigler, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole
No. 76-5097.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.,