Lugo v. Employees Ret. Fund of the Illumination Prods. Indus., 429 U.S. 826 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Lugo v. Employees Ret. Fund of the Illumination Prods. Indus., 429 U.S. 826 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“thus, the petition that was employed to support the claim that petitioners were entitled to a hearing was essentially predicated on conjecture and speculation”
89 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pacelli v. United States (nysd, 1980-11-25) · Strongest negative: Roger C. Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Albert Franco, Shannon J. Wall, Martin F. Hickley, Cross-Appellees (ca5, 1984-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Roger C. Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Albert Franco, Shannon J. Wall, Martin F. Hickley, Cross-Appellees
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
Brewery Employees’ Pension Trust Fund, 670 F.2d 387, 397 (3rd Cir.1982); Roark v. Lewis, 401 F.2d 425, 426-27 (D.C.Cir.1968); but cf. Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 254-56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Pacelli v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
thus, the petition that was employed to support the claim that petitioners were entitled to a hearing was essentially predicated on conjecture and speculation
discussed Cited "see" Moya v. Catholic Archdiocese of NM
N.M. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 , 64 S.Ct. 997 , 88 L.Ed. 1250 (1944), overruled on other grounds, Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 429 U.S. 17 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 21 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Teamsters Local No. 145 v. Kuba
D. Conn. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 256 (2d Cir.) (Feinberg, J.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976) (“[i]t is not necessary for us ... to*agree with plaintiff’s interpretation [of the ‘sole and exclusive benefit’ of the employees requirement of Section 302(c)(5) ] in order to have jurisdiction to decide the case; so long as plaintiff’s claim that the section has been violated is not ‘wholly insubstantial and frivolous’ ... jurisdiction exists”) (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" Corex Corporation, D/B/A Quick Corporation of America v. United States
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States, 429 U.S. 17 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 21 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. Joint Plumbing Industry Board (Local 2, U.S.)
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
Riley v. MEBA Pension Trust, 570 F.2d 406, 412-13 (2d Cir. 1977) (Friendly, J.); accord, Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 529 F.2d 251, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976). .
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. JOINT PLUMBING INDUSTRY BD., ETC.
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
See also Agro v. Joint Plumbing Industry Board, 471 F.Supp. 856 (S.D.N.Y.1979). [5] 29 U.S.C. § 186 (c)(5). [6] Riley v. MEBA Pension Trust, 570 F.2d 406, 412-13 (2d Cir. 1977) (Friendly, J.); accord, Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 529 F.2d 251, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976). [7] We cannot review the application of these rules to an individual claimant under federal law.
cited Cited "see" Knauss v. Gorman
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 529 F.2d at 255 , Cert. denied 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed. 88 (2d Cir. 1976); Riley v. MEBA Pension Trust, 570 F.2d 406, 413 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited Cited "see" Knauss v. Gorman
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 529 F.2d at 255 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed. 88 (2d Cir. 1976); Riley v. MEBA Pension Trust, 570 F.2d 406, 413 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited Cited "see" William J. Riley v. Meba Pension Trust
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 254-55 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Cliff J. Wilson v. Board of Trustees of the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers and Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 388 F.Supp. 997 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 529 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976); Insley v. Joyce, 330 F.Supp. 1228 (N.D.Ill.1971).
discussed Cited "see" Mosley v. National Maritime Union Pension & Welfare Plan
E.D.N.Y · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 254-55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976); Bowers v. Ulpiano Casal, Inc., 393 F.2d 421, 425 (1st Cir. 1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Yakov Drabovskiy v. United States Department of Ho
3rd Cir. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Seese, 679 F.2d at 337 n. 1 (comparing the circumstances in which a District Court should entertain a Rule 60(b) motion under Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 429 U.S. 17 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 21 (1976) (per curiam), with those in which a District Court should not).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Vancol
D. Del. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Barry v. United States, 528 F.2d 1094, 1101-02 (7th Cir.) (insufficiently detailed affidavit that did not demonstrate that petitioners had actual proof of allegations is “patently insufficient” to require hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Barry v. United States, 528 F.2d 1094, 1101-02 (7th Cir.) (insufficiently detailed affidavit that did not demonstrate that petitioners had actual proof of allegations is “patently insufficient” to require hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Iron Workers Local v. Bowen
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976); Bowers v. Moreno, 520 F.2d 843, 845-46 (1st Cir. 1975); Alvares v. Erickson, 514 F.2d 156 , 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 143 , 46 L.Ed.2d 106 (1975); Hutchinson, The Federal Prudent Man Rule under ERISA, 22 Vill.L.Rev. 15, 18-19 (1976) 4 Cf. Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America, 556 F.2d 190, 200-06 (3d Cir. 1977) (§ 302 may provide a basis for implying a damage remedy), cert. denied, 434 U…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Iron Workers Local 272 v. Bowen
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry, 529 F.2d 251, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976); Bowers v. Moreno, 520 F.2d 843, 845-46 (1st Cir. 1975); Alvares v. Erickson, 514 F.2d 156, 165 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 143 , 46 L.Ed.2d 106 (1975) ; Hutchinson, The Federal Prudent Man Rule under ERISA, 22 Vill.L.Rev. 15, 18-19 (1976) . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lugo
v.
Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry
No. 75-1708.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
429 U.S. 826
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.