green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Ben Jean Prevot and Arielle Dominique Prevot, the Minor Children. Jean-Claude Prevot v. Debra Moseman Prevot
But see U.S. v. Sacco, 571 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978), in which a question arose during trial of whether the government had relied upon allegedly improper wiretap evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Von Villas
In addition to Donaldson , in which the court expressly pointed out that Lanza had never been repudiated by the United States Supreme Court or other federal courts (Donaldson v. Superior Court, supra, 35 Cal.3d at pp. 28-30; see Ahmad A. v. Superior Court (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 528, 535 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 747 ]; People v. Elwood (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1365, 1370 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 585 ]; see also, United States v. Paul (6th Cir. 1980) 614 F.2d 115, 116 [61 A.L.R.Fed. 816], cert, den., 446 U.S. 941 [ 64 L.Ed.2d 796 , 100 S.Ct. 2165 ]; United States v. Hearst (9th Cir. 1977) 563 F.2d 1331, 1345 , cert, …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Tillett v. Hodel
Although Section 1302 of the Indian Civil Rights Act effectively imposes certain restrictions upon tribal governments similar, but not identical, to those contained in the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, Id. at 57 , 98 S.Ct. at 1656, federal court enforcement of the Indian Civil Rights Act is limited solely to habeas corpus review of tribal criminal proceedings, Id. at 67, 98 S.Ct. at 1681-82.
cited
Cited "see"
Higgenbottom v. United States
See Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 263 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Upshur v. United States
See Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 262 (D.C.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (citing Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960)) (competency standard for purposes of trial is that defendant have "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer” and to understand the nature of the proceedings against him.) 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Howard
See generally U.S. v. Hearst, 9th Cir., 563 F.2d 1331, 1345-46 (1977), reh’g denied, 9th Cir., 573 F.2d 579 (1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (finding that surreptitiously recording conversations between prisoner and visitor does not violate prisoner’s right to privacy when confronted with state's "justifiable purpose of imprisonment or prison security"); State v. Hauss, App., 142 Ariz. 159 , 688 P.2d 1051, 1054-55 (1984) (holding that, in this case where police were concerned that while couple was in an interview room they would pass a weapon, disc…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Simpson
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1339 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
William A. BROWN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIERRA NEVADA MEMORIAL MINERS HOSPITAL, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1337 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (trial court has discretion to determine the order in which parties should adduce proof at trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Joseph
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1347 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (interagency exchange of evidence without warrant not violative of Fourth Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter H. Kupau
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld); see also United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 598-99 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 705 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld).
cited
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1977) (no abuse when evidence is cumulative), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978). 34 III.
cited
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1977) (no abuse when evidence is cumulative), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 535, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,085, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 978 Belen Torres, (83-1194), (83-1239, 83-1453) v. County of Oakland and Oakland County Community Mental Health Services Board, Jointly and Severally, (83-1194), (83-1239, 83-1453)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1351 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the "average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended").
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. County of Oakland
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1351 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (testimony is not objectionable as containing a legal conclusion where the “average layman would understand those terms and ascribe to them essentially the same meaning intended”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nakao v. Rushen
Accord, *1093 United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1344-45 (9th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Vallez, 653 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 904 , 102 S.Ct. 412 , 70 L.Ed.2d 223 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Stanley Campbell, United States of America v. Riley Ray Fultz
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 516 F.2d 209, 212-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 859 , 96 S.Ct. 112 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James W. Melanson
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1347-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Aloisio, 440 F.2d 705, 710 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 824 , 92 S.Ct. 49 , 30 L.Ed.2d 51 (1971); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Pegues v. United States
See Clyburn v. United States, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 260, 264 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John D. Clardy
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1336 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan Paul (79-5061), and Arnold Chester Pierce (79-5082)
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1344-46 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Stanley Campbell, United States of America v. Riley Ray Fultz
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 516 F.2d 209, 212-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 859 , 96 S.Ct. 112 , 46 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frendak v. United States
(2×)
See Clyburn v. United States, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 260 , 263 n. 7 (1977) (dictum), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) ( Faretta does not overrule Whalem; it does not hold that a court must recognize an incompetent or insane defendant's right to self-representation). [19] Nevertheless, the underlying philosophy of Alford and Faretta is inconsistent with Whalem as currently interpreted.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Glickman AKA Hal Glickman, United States of America v. James Rowe
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 n.2 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Monroe, 552 F.2d 860, 863 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 972 , 97 S.Ct. 2936 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Billy Gale Henry v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978), in which the Ninth Circuit held that such interception did not violate the sixth amendment under Massiah.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hearst
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Hearst, 435 F.Supp. 29 (N.D.Cal.1977); United States v. Hearst, 424 F.Supp. 307 (N.D.Cal. 1976). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Saettele
(2×)
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1335 n.1 (9th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Michelson, 559 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 386 (7th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977). 13 Assuming arguendo that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a reasonable apprehension of injury, nothing in the record suggests that Saettele made any attempt to escape or avoid the threatened danger or was prevented from doing so at any time.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belmer v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1345-46 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Strohl
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S. Ct. 1656 , 56 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hirschfeld
Appeal of Silo, 845 F.2d 1015 (3d Cir.1988); Hall v. Dorsey, 534 F.Supp. 507 (D.Pa.1982); see also United States v. Sacco, 571 F.2d 791 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (federal courts have consistently held that there is no right of the defendant to represent himself and be represented by counsel). 1 Thus, in order to ascertain Mr. Tweel’s status in this litigation and consequently to determine whether or not Mr. Hirschfeld was still proceeding pro se, this Court, in its Order of November 15, 1995, asked Mr. Tweel to explain his responsibilities …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan Paul Robertson, United States of America v. Juan Paul Robertson
See, e.g., Bordenkircher, 434 U.S. at 368 n. 2, 98 S.Ct. at 670 n. 2 (Blackmun, J., dissenting); United States v. Andrews, 612 F.2d 235 , 241-42 n. 7 (6th Cir.1979), reh'g en banc, 633 F.2d 449 (1980), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. State
Compare United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1350-52 (9th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (psychiatrists testifying on behalf of the government were permitted to express their opinions that the defendant did not take part in a bank robbery because she was in fear of her life, but rather, engaged in the illegal activity voluntarily).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Eugene McCollum
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thorne v. United States
See, e.g., Clyburn v. United States, 381 A.2d 260, 262-63 (D.C.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert J. Neely v. Thomas Israel
See also United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1342 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen Gonsalves
See, e.g., United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1336 & n.2 (9th Cir. 1977) (duress), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978); United States v. Hermosillo-Nanez, 545 F.2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir. 1976) (entrapment), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1050 , 97 S.Ct. 763 , 50 L.Ed.2d 767 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Joe Dooley
See also United States v. Hearst, 9 Cir., 1977, 563 F.2d 1331, 1338-44 , cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clyburn
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-6449.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1978.
Published
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.