discussed Cited "see" United States v. Richard Edison Boyd, A/K/A Jake Boyd See United States v. Nickell, 552 F.2d 684, 689-90 (6th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 436 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 2233 , 56 L.Ed.2d 402 (1978) (Holding that it is not an abuse of discretion for the district court to refuse either to order the government to produce or to screen materials in camera if the defendant fails to provide a foundation for the government to turn over any materials as Jencks Act statements, or for the court to screen any materials.).

cited Cited "see" Reed v. United States See United States v. Nickell, 552 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 2233 , 56 L.Ed.2d 402 (1978).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Eddie Pope, United States of America v. Larry Norris, United States of America v. Joshua James, United States of America v. Robert P. Williamson See also Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 83 , 91 S.Ct. 210 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970). 47 In any event, the indictment made it clear that the exact dates of the conspiracy were unknown, setting forth as the commencement August 27, 1975, and its conclusion as October 16, 1975. 48 Affirmed. 1 The district judge explained that a chain conspiracy is characterized by "various activities concerned with or related to a common objective, so that each conspirator, in a chain-like manner, performs a separate and distinct function which serves as a link or phase in the accomplishment of the over-all objective…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pope See e. g., United States v. Nickell, 552 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 98 S.Ct. 2233 , 56 L.Ed.2d 402 for a definition of a “statement.” . 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (c) provides: (c) If the United States claims that any statement ordered to be produced under this section contains matter which does not relate to the subject matter of the testimony of the witness, the court shall order the United States to deliver such statement for the inspection of the court in camera.