Drielick v. Michigan, 434 U.S. 1047 (1978). · Go Syfert
Drielick v. Michigan, 434 U.S. 1047 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“n order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with no mention of amendment and no attempt at amendment shown in the record is a final appealable order....”
62 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Houghton v. COUNTY COM'RS OF KENT CTY. (md, 1986-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Houghton v. COUNTY COM'RS OF KENT CTY.
Md. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
n order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with no mention of amendment and no attempt at amendment shown in the record is a final appealable order....
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Orlando Jacobs
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir.1977) ("Whether the government should be required to accept defendant’s offer to stipulate as to the fact of a prior felony conviction is a discretionary matter with the trial court."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. O'Shea, 724 F.2d 1514, 1516-17 (11th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Dockery, 955 F.2d 50, 54 (D.C.Cir.1992) (dictum). .
cited Cited "see" Csx Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153 , 1166 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); 13A C.
cited Cited "see" State v. Hale
Ariz. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael John Grassi, Jr.
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); Wright, supra, § 5194 at 198-199.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2962, at 614 (1973) (“when a court declines to make a formal ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, but its action has the effect of denying the requested relief, its refusal to issue a specific order will be treated as equivalent to the denial of a preliminary injunction and will be appeal-able”); see also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977) (“the indefinite continuance amounted to the refusing of an injunction and is appealable”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2962, at 614 (1973) ("when a court declines to make a formal ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, but its action has the effect of denying the requested relief, its refusal to issue a specific order will be treated as equivalent to the denial of a preliminary injunction and will be appealable"); see also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977) ("the indefinite continuance amounted to the refusing of an injunction and is appealable"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rolo v. General Development Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. Lynd, 301 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 893 , 83 S.Ct. 187 , 9 L.Ed.2d 125 (1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, City Investing Company Liquidating Trust, Carteret Bancorp, Inc., Carteret Savings Bank, Fa, George T. Scharffenberger, Marshall Manley, Edwin I. Hatch, Eben W. Pyne, Reubin O'd. Askew, Howard L. Clark, Jr., Charles J. Simons, Peter R. Brinckerhoff, Cravath, Swaine, David G. Ormsby, Painewebber Incorporated, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, the Prudential Insurance Company of America, National Bank of Canada, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., First National Bank of Boston, Federal National Mortgage Association, Chase Federal Bank, Fsb, Secor Bank, Fsb, Oxford First Corp., the Oxford Finance Companies, Inc., Stanchart Business Credit, Inc., Harbor Federal Savings and Loan Association, Greyhound Financial Corporation, Lloyds Bank Plc, John Does 1-10. Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, United States District Judge, Nominal
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. Lynd, 301 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 893 , 83 S.Ct. 187 , 9 L.Ed.2d 125 (1962). 32 For an interlocutory order to be immediately appealable under § 1292(a)(1), however, the Rolos "must show more than that the order has the practical effect of refusing an injunction." Carson v. American Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84 , 101 S.Ct. 993, 996 , 67 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sweitzer v. Hewitt
M.D. Penn. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1007 (10th Cir.) (with exculpatory accomplice testimony, accomplice charge may well be inappropriate), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Drielick
v.
Michigan
No. 77-816.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
434 U.S. 1047

Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.