green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Ashford
Cir.1976), 538 F.2d 408 ("voiceprint" evidence held inadmissible); State v. Gortarez (1984), 141 Ariz. 254 , 686 P.2d 1224 (same); People v. Kelly (1976), 17 Cal.3d 24 , 549 P.2d 1240 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 144 (same); Cornett v. State (Ind. 1983), 450 N.E.2d 498 (same); but see United States v. Williams (2d Cir.1978), 583 F.2d 1194 , cert. denied (1979), 439 U.S. 1117 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 ("voiceprint" evidence held admissible); Alea v. State (Fla. App. 1972), 265 So.2d 96 (same); Commonwealth v. Lykus (1975), 367 Mass. 191 , *79 327 N.E.2d 671 (same).) We need not address the admissibil…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Natson
See generally United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savage v. Union Pacific Railroad
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) (noting professional organization’s standard governing spectrographic analysis), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Bank of Commerce v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) (noting professional organization’s standard governing spectro-graphic analysis), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) (noting professional organization’s standard governing spectrographic analysis), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 , 1200 n. 13 (2d Cir.1978) (trier of fact entitled to reject expert testimony), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cotton v. Com.
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (CA2 1978) (noting professional organization's standard governing spectrographic analysis), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 [ 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 ] (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Reginald F. Whatley Cindy D. Whatley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
See Calhoun v. United States, 591 F.2d 1243, 1245 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) (admissible if proba-tiveness, materiality, and reliability outweigh its tendency to mislead, prejudice, and confuse the jury), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 794 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 104 , 121 L.Ed.2d 63 (1992); People v. Castro, 144 Misc.2d 956 , 545 N.Y.S.2d 985 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1989) (Frye test with additional layer for DNA cases); United States v. Two Bulls, 918 F.2d 56 (8th Cir.) (adopting Castro test), vacated (and appeal …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lawrence Payne
See United States v. Burman, 584 F.2d 1354, 1356 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 (1979) (each defendant "reasonably knew that smuggling and various other illegal transactions were required to make their own dealing possible.").
cited
Cited "see"
Bird v. State
See United States v. Williams [ 583 F.2d 1194 , 1199-1200 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979)].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maivia
See, United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198-1201 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1975); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463, 465-467 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25, 32-34 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2654 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harper
See generally United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1199-1200 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463, 466-67 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. John W. Downing
(5×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) (court relies on the "established considerations applicable to the admissibility of evidence"), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); State v. Hall, 297 N.W.2d 80 (Iowa 1980) (en banc ); 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gortarez
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25 (6th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Williams
See United States v. Palmere, 578 F.2d 105 (5th Cir.1978) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 , 99 S.Ct. 1026 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Contreras
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wamser v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (2d Cir.1978) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Cornett v. State
See United States v. Williams, (2d Cir.1978) 583 F.2d 1194, 1197 , f.n. 5, cert. denied, (1979) 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Billy Merritt v. Gordon H. Faulkner
(2×)
See Morrow v. Igleburger, 584 F.2d 767 , 772 n. 7 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 , 99 S.Ct. 1027 , 59 L.Ed.2d 78 (1979); Marks v. Calendine, 80 F.R.D. 24, 27 (N.D.W.Va.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baynes
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Jenkins, 525 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1975); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baynes
See United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Jenkins, 525 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1975); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bifulco v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Burman, 584 F. 2d 1354, 1356-1358 (CA4 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 1118 (1979), and United States v. Jacobson, 578 F. 2d 863, 867-868 (CA10), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 932 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marsh v. Valyou
Compare, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (C.A.2 1978) ( Frye is superseded by the Rules of Evidence), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1117 [, 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 ] (1979), with Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F.2d 1106, 1111, 1115-1116 (C.A.5 1991) (en banc) ( Frye and the Rules coexist), cert, denied, 503 U.S. 912 [, 112 S.Ct. 1280 , 117 L.Ed.2d 506 ] (1992), 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Maelega
(2×)
See also id. at 138-39 n. 5, 828 P.2d at 1280 n. 5 (citing other relevant factors from United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Starzecpyzel
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978) (pretrial hearing established speetrographic voice analysis admissible as identification evidence), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); Government of the Virgin Islands v. Penn, 838 F.Supp. 1054, 1073-74 (D.V.I.1993) (in limine Daubert hearing established DNA profiling test as sufficiently reliable).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hagins v. United States
See also Sinclair v. United States, 388 A.2d 1201, 1204 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 , 99 S.Ct. 1026 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fishback v. People
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979) (court applied balancing test); United States v. Kelly, 420 F.2d 26 (2d Cir.1969) (probity of government's expert evidence as attacked by defense is typical question for jury); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224 (3rd Cir.1985) ( Frye standard neither a necessary nor sufficient question for admissibility; general acceptance is single factor in broader reliability inquiry); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1991
It is therefore inappropriate to view this threshold question of reliability as a matter within each trial judge's individual discretion." Reed v. State, 283 Md. 374 , 391 A.2d 364, 367 (1978); see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-1201 (2d Cir.1978) (applying de novo review to the question of the general acceptance of a scientific technique), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979). 5 For expert opinion based on a given scientific methodology to be admissible, the methodology cannot diverge significantly from the procedures accepted by recognized a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
It is therefore inappropriate to view this threshold question of reliability as a matter within each trial judge’s individual discretion.” Reed v. State, 283 Md. 374 , 391 A.2d 364, 367 (1978); see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-1201 (2d Cir.1978) (applying de novo review to the question of the general acceptance of a scientific technique), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.
Berger, 3 Weinstein’s Evidence, ¶ 702[03] at 702-36 (1990); see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) ("scientific voting pattern” irrelevant to court's reliability inquiry), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1236-37 (3d Cir.1985) (analyzing "serious flaws” of Frye test, and finding its "conservative approach to the admissibility of scientific evidence” contrary to the spirit of the Federal Rules); United States v. Bailer, 519 F.2d 463, 466 (4th Cir.) (“Unless an exaggerated popula…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corporation
Berger, 3 Weinstein's Evidence, p 702 at 702-36 (1990); see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198 (2d Cir.1978) ("scientific voting pattern" irrelevant to court's reliability inquiry), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1236-37 (3d Cir.1985) (analyzing "serious flaws" of Frye test, and finding its "conservative approach to the admissibility of scientific evidence" contrary to the spirit of the Federal Rules); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463, 466 (4th Cir.) ("Unless an exaggerated popular opinion of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tamara Jo Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1198-1201 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463, 465-67 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25, 32-34 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2656 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975). 3 We join these circuits today, and hold that expert testimony concerning spectrographic voice analysis is admissible in cases where the proponent of this testimony has established a proper foundation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gipson
Others go the opposite way, concluding outright that Frye is no longer the “independent controlling standard of admissibility.” United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d at 1237 ; see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Dorfman, 532 F.Supp. 1118, 1134 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mustafa
Berger, Evidence, para. 702[03] (1982); see also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); State v. Hall, 297 N.W.2d 80 (Iowa 1980); but see United States v. Brady, 595 F.2d 359 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 862 , 100 S.Ct. 129 , 62 L.Ed.2d 84 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Contreras v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); State v. Hall, 297 N.W.2d 80, 84-85 (Iowa 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 927 , 101 S.Ct. 1384 , 67 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981). [21] In Greenway we held that a hearsay exception recognized in a prior case, Torres v. State, 519 P.2d 788 , 793 n. 9 (Alaska 1974), but not listed in evidence rule 803, was still valid and that "this omission, ... was more in the nature of an oversight ... and not a repudiation of Torres." We referred the question to the standing com…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jefferey Dale Ellis, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Ellis, Deceased v. International Playtex, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See also United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Bennett, 539 F.2d 45, 53 (10th Cir. 1976); United States v. Wilson, 361 F.Supp. 510 (D.Md.1973); United States v. Ridling, 350 F.Supp. 90 (E.D.Mich.1972). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bothwell
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1117 , 99 S.Ct. 1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 456 , 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); see also United States v. Luschen, 614 F.2d 1164 , 1169 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 939 , 100 S.Ct. 2161 , 64 L.Ed.2d 793 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
See also United States v. DuFriend, 691 F.2d 948 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 820 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983) (affirming defendant’s conviction of conspiracies to import 600 pounds of marijuana in a small airplane and to possess with intent to distribute it, and holding that evidence of a large quantity of a controlled substance was relevant to intent to distribute) (citing United States v. Paimere, 578 F.2d 105, 108 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1118 , 99 S.Ct. 1026 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979)); United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455…
Kelly
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 78-5612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1979.
Published
Sup. Ct. La. Cer-tiorari denied.