green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.4 score
“it is the incremental probity of the evidence that is to be balanced against its potential for undue prejudice”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Thompson v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But cf the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca4 1988
But see, United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979) 7 Rule 601 of the Federal Rules of Evidence states that "[e]very person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules." However, since Hilary was never called as a witness, we are not directly faced with the issue of whether she would have been competent to testify at trial.
cited
Cited "but see"
Morgan v. Foretich
But see, United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Williams
it is the incremental probity of the evidence that is to be balanced against its potential for undue prejudice
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. McGlew
flalsified financial statements generally do not cause such unfair inflammatory reactions
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cartwright
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S. Ct. 1244 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Saad Zerrei v. Alberto R. Gonzales
See Cabral-Avila v. INS, 589 F.2d 957, 959 (9th Cir.1978) (holding that once the INS establishes a prima facie case of deportability by clear and convincing evidence, the burden shifts to the alien to demonstrate that he has secured authorization to remain), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1245 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); accord Zaitona v. INS, 9 F.3d 432, 434 (6th Cir.1993); Bustos-Torres v. INS, 898 F.2d 1053, 1058 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erazo, Alex
See United States v. Beechum, 5112 F.2d 898 , 910-11 n.13 (5th Cir. 1978)(en bancXnoting significance of congressional committee's amendment to original rule 404(b) placing greater emphasis on admissibility of extraneous offense evidence to bring rule in line with rule 402 which establishes presumption that all relevant evidence admissible), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979); Rodda v. State, 745 S.W.2d 415, 418-19 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, pet. ref'd)(citing Beechum with approval and applying it to Texas law).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dexter
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Flores
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979). 6 The government also points to the quantity of drugs found in the trailer, asserting that drug dealers would not entrust over 300 pounds of marijuana with an unsuspecting driver.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucio Arturo Garcia-Flores
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (enbanc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pollani
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (“It is derogative of the search for truth to allow a defendant to tell his story of innocence without facing him with evidence impeaching that story.”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Misher
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mammah
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 914 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Edward Brown
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (stating that the first step in a Rule 404(b) analysis is to decide whether the challenged evidence was relevant to an issue other than character), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Finney v. State
Accord United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 915 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1995
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fernell Wilwright, Erskin Duskin and Michael Turner
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 910-11 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (explaining that Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) requires first, a determination that the extrinsic offense evidence is relevant to an issue other than character, and second, that the evidence pass the requirements of rule 403), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Perrigo
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S. Ct. 1244 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Robichaux
See U.S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979) for a discussion of this two-step approach to admission of extrinsic evidence. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Robichaux
See U.S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979) for a discussion of this two-step approach to admission of extrinsic evidence. 3 U.S. v. Emery, 682 F.2d 493, 497 (5th Cir. 1982) cert. denied 459 U.S. 1044 (1982). 5 The probative value of this evidence is strong.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis J. Murray
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 [, 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 ] (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marion Eugene Fair
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Judith Perez, Marjorie Conrade
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 907 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Haskins
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 913 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald Thigpen v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Willie D. Johnson, Warden, Holman Unit
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 902 n. 10 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979). 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeff Edward Fortenberry, Jr.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
H & W Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Occidental Chemical Corp., Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 909-18 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205, 210 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1008 , 104 S.Ct. 1003 , 79 L.Ed.2d 235 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
Although the extrinsic incident at issue in Lisenba did not result in a conviction or even in criminal charges, the Court sustained the state trial court’s admission of the evidence because of “the widely recognized principle that similar but disconnected acts may be shown to establish intent, design, and system.” Id., 62 S.Ct. at 286 ; see United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 910 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Miller, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 912 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Buhl
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gamble
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 [ 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 ] (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Diggs v. David Owens, Superintendent and John Daughn, Warden
See United States v. Boyd, 437 F.Supp. 519 (W.D.Pa.1977), aff'd without opinion, 578 F.2d 1376 (3rd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1243 , 59 L.Ed.2d 471 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tito Perez, Jr.
At trial's end, the court ruled that it would admit evidence of Perez' extrinsic marijuana offense under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); see generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979), as substantive evidence of Perez’ intent in the instant cocaine offense.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Gene Henthorn and Tom D. Riley
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. United States
These courts have perceived a sufficient foundation in defense counsel’s opening statement, United States v. Price, 617 F.2d 455, 459-60 (7th Cir.1979) (suggested alleged bribes were “gifts” or “contributions”), or in previous proceedings in the same case, United States v. Adderly, 529 F.2d 1178, 1182 (5th Cir.1976) (hung jury), or in the obviousness of intent, for example, as “the only real issue,” United States v. DeLoach, 210 U.S.App.D.C. 48, 54 , 654 F.2d 763, 769 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1717 , 68 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); accord United States v. Beechum, 58…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Leon Dotson
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Merriweather
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 608 F.2d 551, 555 (5th Cir.1979) (“extrinsic evidence may only be introduced if ‘an offense was in fact committed and the defendant in fact committed it.’ United States v. Beechum, [ 582 F.2d 898, 912 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979)]”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carolyn Lewis
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. DiZenzo, 500 F.2d 263, 265 (4th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Byrd, Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); United States v. Salisbury, 662 F.2d 738 (11th Cir.1981) (following Beechum), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 2907 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde Alvin Williford, Sr., Clyde Alvin Williford, Jr.
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jamieson
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony Campos
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 912-13 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 (1979); cf. Proposed N.H.R.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz Harig
See generally United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 , 911 n. 15 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
Rees
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-5725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.