green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Farnham
(2×)
we perceive a distinction . . . between punishing a defendant for maintaining his innocence and preserving his right to appeal ... and merely considering a defendant's failure to recant when evaluating his prospects of rehabilitation without incarceration
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daoust
The reasonableness of the challenged conduct must be viewed in light of “what the officers had reason to believe at the time of their entry,” Ker, 374 U.S. at 40 -41 n. 12, 83 S.Ct. at 1633 n. 12 (emphasis in original); see United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F.2d 4, 10-12 (9th Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 416 U.S. 970 , 94 S.Ct. 1993 , 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974), and by balancing the official intrusion against whatever legitimate governmental interests it serves, see Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. at 654, 99 S.Ct. at 1396 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pena
(2×)
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979) (the defendant unlocked the incriminating bag, having denied knowledge or interest in the luggage); United States v. Bertucci, 532 F.2d 1144 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976) (defendant opened the rear door of his van in response to a policeman's request to search the vehicle more closely).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Christopher Ingraham A/K/A Arthur Robert MacKeil
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 , 1135 n. 17 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bridewell
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. ___ , ___, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 1155 , 94 L.Ed.2d 347, 357 (1987) (White J., concurring). [3] See also United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1125 (1st Cir.1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979); State v. Perry, 298 Or. 21, 26 , 688 P.2d 827 (1984); State v. Davis, supra, 295 Or. at 238 , 666 P.2d 802 ; State v. Newman, supra ; State v. Okeke, 82 Or.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Petrillo
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1128 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan C. Santamaria
(2×)
See United States v. Foss, 501 F.2d 522, 527 (1st Cir.1974) (sentences dictated by a mechanistic concept of what a particular type of crime deserves may be vacated by appellate court); accord United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1138 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
W.H. Farner v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., and Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, a Partnership
(2×)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c); see Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., 580 F.2d 215, 218 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Belic v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
See Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., Inc., 580 F.2d 215 , 219 & n. 5 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank M. Long, Steak N' Lobster, Inc., Reagan Joe Baker
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1138 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thornton
State v. Gallant, 308 A.2d 274, 278 (Me. 1973) (radiographic scanning by customs of official mail entering country not search); see United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1125 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979) (no rea *494 sonable expectation of privacy because boat, like automobile, carries lesser expectation of privacy than home or office); United States v. Taylor, 515 F.Supp. 1321, 1326 (D.Me.1981) (no reasonable expectation of privacy in film delivered to commercial establishment for developing); United States v. Hensel, 509 F.Supp. 1376 , …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Arias, Earl Lavell Faircloth, Gerald E. Michael, Idael Manuel Jimenez-Mora, Laten Gene Reaves, and Roger Suggs
(2×)
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1137 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis P. Tracey
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1139 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Melton
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1 Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1131 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca6 1981
(2×)
See Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., Inc., 580 F.2d 215, 218-19 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Baldwin
See the discussion in United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1130-1132 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 (1979), of situations in which consent may be implied.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruzicka v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
See Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., Inc., 580 F.2d 215, 218-19 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. $572,204 in US Currency, More or Less
See also U.S. v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1st Cir.1978) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979)(a mixed motive for a stop is irrelevant once finding of probable cause is made).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick
United States v. Figueroa, 818 F.2d 1020, 1023 (1st Cir.1987); see also United States v. Aguirre, 839 F.2d 854, 857-58 (1st Cir.1988) (the probable cause determination requires “the likelihood that an offense has been committed and that there is sound reason to believe that a particular search will turn up evidence of it.”). .The information necessary for a probable cause determination is not the “quantum of proof necessary to convict.” United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1128 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
MENDEZ
See also Miller v. United States, 589 F.2d 1117, 1138 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 (1979); Scott v. United States, 419 F.2d 264 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez
See also United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 , 1132 n. 13 (1st Cir.1978) (good faith assertion by police officer that he would seek warrant if suspect did not consent to search does not make suspect’s subsequent consent involuntary), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Valentine
See also United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. E-II Holdings, Inc.
See also Central Montana Electric Power Corp. v. Administrator, 840 F.2d 1472 , 1474-75 (9th Cir.1988) (giving standing to cooperatives), and Adams v. Morton, 581 F.2d 1314, 1319 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1498 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979) (giving standing to representatives of Indian tribes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lambert
See also United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1138 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979) (when sentence is based upon mechanistic application of rules unrelated to a defendant’s character, the general rule that sentencing decisions are within the exclusive discretion of the trial court is inapplicable); United States v. Foss, 501 F.2d 522, 527 (1st Cir.1974) (“any kind of mechanical sentencing that steadfastly ignores individual differences is to be avoided”); United States v. Schwarz, 500 F.2d 1350, 1352 (2d Cir.1974) (court invalidated a …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
The court reasoned that “the underlying policies of federal labor law will not be furthered by enmeshing § 301 breach of contract actions in technicalities that operate to the disadvantage of plaintiffs who have acted entirely in good faith in following the contract’s command that they first submit their grievance to the arbitration process.” Id. at 450; see also Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., 580 F.2d 215 , 219 n. 5 (6th Cir.1978) (litigants should not be penalized for complying with federal labor policy requiring that section 301 plaintiff seek arbitral relief as a prerequisite to feder…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
The court reasoned that “the underlying policies of federal labor law will not be furthered by enmeshing § 301 breach of contract actions in technicalities that operate *1411 to the disadvantage of plaintiffs who have acted entirely in good faith in following the contract’s command that they first submit their grievance to the arbitration process.” Id. at 450; see also Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., 580 F.2d 215 , 219 n. 5 (6th Cir.1978) (litigants should not be penalized for complying with federal labor policy requiring that section 301 plaintiff seek arbitral relief as a prerequisite to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Atkinson
(2×)
See, e.g., US v. Miller, 589 F2d 1117, 1125 (1st Cir) cert denied 440 US 958 , 99 S Ct 1499 , 59 L Ed 2d 771 (1979) (where a boat of unknown origin had been abandoned at a mooring belonging to another person, fouled in its lines, and where the circumstances justified a reasonable fear of a drowning, the combination of “community caretaking functions” and possibly exigent circumstances amply justified intruding upon the limited privacy expectations surrounding the abandoned vessel in order to determine the boat’s ownership and the safety of its mariners); Evans v. State, 364 So 2d 93, 94 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis Mann, D.O. v. Joseph E. Cannon, M.D., Lewis Mann, D.O. v. Joseph E. Cannon, M.D., Appeal of Leo Gracik, Leo Grandchamp and Charles Hachadorian
See also United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1128 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman E. Edwards and Bobby Wayne Mize v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
(2×)
Compare Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., 580 F.2d 215 , 217, 219 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979); Butler v. Local Union No. 823, Int’l Bd. of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442, 447-48 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975); Kennedy v. Wheeling-Pittsburg Steel Corp., 81 L.R.R.M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perez, John T. v. Dana Corporation, Parish Frame Division and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 3733
(2×)
Compare Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., 580 F.2d 215, 217, 219 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979); Butler v. Local Union No. 823, Int’l Bd. of Teamsters, 514 F.2d 442 , 447-48 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 265 , 46 L.Ed.2d 249 (1975); Kennedy v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 81 L.R.R.M. 2349 , 69 CCH Labor Cases ¶ 12,980 (4th Cir. 1972); and Abrams v. Carrier Corp., 434 F.2d 1234, 1252 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1009 , 91 S.Ct. 1253 , 28 L.Ed.2d 545 (1971) (applying same limitations period), with Sanderson …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rose v. General Motors Corp., Frigidaire Div.
(2×)
See also, Smart v. Ellis Trucking Co., Inc., 580 F.2d 215 , 219 n. 5 (6th Cir.1978) (citing Butler approvingly on this point), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1497 , 59 L.Ed.2d 770 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn Pollack
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 , 1132 n.13 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979); United States v. Agosto, 502 F.2d 612, 614 (9th Cir. 1974); United States v. Culp, 472 F.2d 459, 461 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 970 , 93 S.Ct. 2161 , 36 L.Ed.2d 692 (1973); United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Myers, 378 F.2d 398, 399 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 96 , 24 L.Ed.2d 96 (1969); Robbins v. MacKenzie, 364 F.2d 45, 50 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 913 , 87 S.Ct. 215…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Joseph Arra, Steven Scott Aschinger, and Overton Baker Pettit
See also United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 , 1125 n. 3 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979) (warrantless safety and document checks of vessels are “undoubtedly constitutional”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keith Canady
Compare United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979), where the defendant, after being arrested, opened the door of a vehicle which contained baggage.
Ellis Trucking Co., Inc.
v.
Smart
v.
Smart
No. 78-792.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (2)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.