green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lockwood
See Allard v. Helgemoe, 572 F.2d 1, 26 (1st Cir.) (failure to understand the intent element of burglary did not render plea unconstitutional where counsel provided defendant with full information prior to plea), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Dennis Jacks, Jr. v. Jack Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, and Indiana Attorney General
Accord United States v. Trujillo, 578 F.2d 285 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Angel R. Figueroa-Vazquez v. United States
See Allard v. Helgemoe, 572 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1978) (“[T]est must be whether [the defendant] has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding — and whether he has a rational as well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him.”) (quoting Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960) (per curiam)), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Quarrels
See Allard v. Helgemoe, 572 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S. Ct. 175 , 58 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Vanda v. Lane
See also United States v. Trujillo, 578 F.2d 285 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed.2d 166 (1978) (silence and request for counsel); contra Greenfield v. Wainwright, 741 F.2d 329 (11th Cir.1984), aff’d 474 U.S. 284 , 106 S.Ct. 634 , 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986); State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983), ce rt. denied 466 U.S. 931 , 104 S.Ct. 1719 , 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1984) (silence and request for counsel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Burnett
In Sieling v. Eyman (9th Cir. 1973) 478 F.2d 211 , it was held that a hearing is required to determine the defendant’s ability to plead guilty “[w]here the question of a defendant’s lack of mental capacity lurks in the background.” (Id., at p. 214.) Sieling adopted the dissent of Justice Hufstedler in the earlier case of Schoeller v. Dunbar (9th Cir. 1970) 423 F.2d 1183 , cert. den. 400 U.S. 834 [ 27 L.Ed.2d 66 , 91 S.Ct. 69 ], in which she stated that “[a] defendant is not competent to plead guilty if mental illness has substantially impaired his ability to make a reasoned choice am…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allard
v.
Helgemoe, Warden
v.
Helgemoe, Warden
No. 77-7010.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.