State v. Rozier, 321 S.E.2d 907 (N.C. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Rozier, 321 S.E.2d 907 (N.C. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · …taken in context, the prosecutor's metaphor falls short of the direct name-calling, or vituperative hyperbole, which has been found to be reversible error in other cases.
80 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sims (ncctapp, 2003-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Sims (4×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
taken in context, the prosecutor's metaphor falls short of the direct name-calling, or vituperative hyperbole, which has been found to be reversible error in other cases.
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Carey Preston ROZIER and Harold Dean Carter.
518P84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 2, 1984.
321 S.E.2d 907
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (4)

Adam Stein, Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant Harold Dean Carter.

Elizabeth C. Bunting, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Defendant's (Carter) petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.