Buchanan v. Atl. Indem. Co., 454 S.E.2d 647 (N.C. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Buchanan v. Atl. Indem. Co., 454 S.E.2d 647 (N.C. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a party may be estopped to plead and rely on a statute of limitations defense when delay has been induced by acts, representations, or conduct which would amount to a breach of good faith.”
26 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Friedland v. Gales (ncctapp, 1998-12-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Friedland v. Gales
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a party may be estopped to plead and rely on a statute of limitations defense when delay has been induced by acts, representations, or conduct which would amount to a breach of good faith.
cited Cited "see" Toomer v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Cacha v. Montaco, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bryant v. Adams, 116 N.C.App. 448, 460 , 448 S.E.2d 832, 838 (1994) ("Equitable estoppel may ... defeat a defendant's statute of repose defense."), disc. review denied, 339 N.C. 736 , 454 S.E.2d 647 (1995); One North McDowell Assn. v. McDowell Development Co., 98 N.C.App. 125, 127-28 , 389 S.E.2d 834, 836 (stating that "[i]t is well established that the doctrine of equitable estoppel will deny the right to assert a defense based on lapse of time" and concluding that "Defendants are therefore estopped from raising [the statute of repose] in bar of plaintiffs' action"), disc. review denied, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anderson v. Hedstrom Corp. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bryant v. Adams, 116 N.C.App. 448, 466 , 448 S.E.2d 832 (1994), review denied, 339 N.C. 736 , 454 S.E.2d 647 (1995); Liesener v. Weslo, Inc., 775 F.Supp. 857, 861 (D.Md.1991) (both addressing obviousness of risk as a matter of law for purpose of determining whether warnings were necessary).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BUCHANAN
v.
ATLANTIC INDEMNITY CO.
No. 541PA94.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 1995.
454 S.E.2d 647
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 2 March 1995.