green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America v. Angoff
Servs., Inc. of Missouri, et al. v. Frappier, 681 S.W.2d 925, 931 (Mo.1984) (not covered), vacated, 472 U.S. 1014 , 105 S.Ct. 3471 , 87 L.Ed.2d 608 , and readopted on remand, 6 98 S.W.2d 326 (Mo.1985); Angoff v. Kenemore, et al., 887 S.W.2d 782, 786 (Mo.Ct.App.1994) (not covered).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas CHAPMAN, Employee/Appellant
v.
JONES CHEMICALS, INC., Employer/Respondent
v.
JONES CHEMICALS, INC., Employer/Respondent
No. 66011.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 29, 1994.
Ronald B. Wessel, St. Louis, for appellant., S. Alan Cotten, St. Louis, for respondent.
Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Employee appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits. The Administrative Law Judge found that claimant was not entitled to benefits because she failed to give employer adequate notice of her injury, and this decision was affirmed by the Commission. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).