green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
SOUTHSIDE CIVIC ASS'N, INC. v. Guaranty Sav. Assur. Co.
See Time-Saver Stores, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of City of New Orleans, 261 So.2d 273 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1973), writ refused, 262 La. 311 , 263 So.2d 47 ; East Baton Rouge Parish v. Bratcher, 244 So.2d 915 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971), writ refused, 258 La. 364 , 246 So.2d 684 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People's Bank & Trust Co. v. Campbell
(2×)
See also, New Orleans Silversmiths, Inc. v. Toups, 261 So.2d 252 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), writ refused, 262 La. 309 , 263 So.2d 47 (1972), and Odom v. Cherokee Homes, Inc., 165 So.2d 855 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1964), writ refused, 246 La. 868 , 167 So.2d 677 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEW ORLEANS SILVERSMITHS, INC.
v.
Algert J. TOUPS
v.
Algert J. TOUPS
52562.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 22, 1972.
Tate.
Published
TATE, J.,
concurs. Technically, as the court of appeal dissent correctly points out, Civil Code Article 3158 and its 1952 amendment only affect a pledge and do not regulate the extent of a mortgage and the necessity for a principal debt secured thereby, insofar as third persons are concerned. Nevertheless, taking into consideration the jurisprudential development of the “collateral mortgage” security device, based upon the pledge of the collateral mortgage note, I think the court of appeal majority ascribed an appropriate legislative intent t® the 1952 amendment of Article 3158.