green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Fox v. State
See Russell v. State, 458 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), approved, 472 So.2d 466 (Fla.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Natal EL-RA-SUL
v.
Natal EL-RA-SUL
No. 66133.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 27, 1985.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Thomas H. Bateman, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner., Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent.
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Published
EHRLICH, Justice.
This cause is before the Court pursuant to the jurisdictional grant in article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, on the certified question of great public importance we answered in State v. Phillips, 463 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1985).
The decision of the district court, 456 So.2d 1244, is quashed and the order of the trial court is reinstated.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.