Kahles v. State, 657 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Kahles v. State, 657 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kasm v. Lynnel (fladistctapp, 2008-02-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kasm v. Lynnel
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
In 1994, however, the legislature amended section 61.16(1), to provide: "The trial court shall have continuing jurisdiction to make temporary attorney's fees and costs awards reasonably necessary to prosecute or defend an appeal on the same basis and criteria as though the matter were pending before it at the trial level." Ch. 94-169, § 1, at 1039, Laws of Fla. In turn, the Florida Supreme Court amended rule 9.600(c) to provide: "In dissolution of marriage actions the lower tribunal shall retain jurisdiction to enter and enforce orders awarding . . . temporary attorneys' fees and costs reason…
discussed Cited "see" State v. De La Llana
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512, 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (urging the bench and bar to follow the step-by-step process set out in Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. in cases in which a criminal statute is attacked as unconstitutional on its face), approved, 657 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1995).
discussed Cited "see" City of Sarasota v. Calhoun
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512 , 513 n. 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), approved, 657 So.2d 897 (Fla.1995); State v. Peters, 534 So.2d 760 , 766 n. 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So.2d 1334 (Fla.1989) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 610 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2914-15 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)).
cited Cited "see" Altingeyik v. State
Fla. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kahles v. State, 657 So.2d 897 (Fla.1995).
Robert KAHLES, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
84748.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1995.
657 So. 2d 897
Shaw.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey Pastel Dougan and Diane M. Cuddihy, Asst. Public Defenders, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the district court held Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), constitutional. On motion for rehearing, the court certified the issue to this Court. See State v. Kahles, 19 Fla. L. Weekly D2225 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 19, 1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S186, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Kahles.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.