Ross v. State, 892 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Ross v. State, 892 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Burch v. State (fladistctapp, 2009-02-04) · Strongest negative: Akins v. State (fladistctapp, 2006-03-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Akins v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Scanes v. State, 876 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2004).
cited Cited "see" Burch v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zink v. State, 943 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), Scanes v. State, 876 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2004).
discussed Cited "see" Petruny v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005) (finding that the warning given was insufficient to satisfy Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), because it failed to advise of the right to have counsel present during questioning and advised merely that defendant could have counsel present before questioning).
discussed Cited "see" Stancle v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied sub nom., State v. West, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005); Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568, 573 (Fla.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 970 , 145 L.Ed.2d 841 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Zink v. State, 943 So.2d 895, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“ ‘Here, it is clear from the plea colloquy, the written habitual felony offender finding, and the written sentence, that the trial court intended to, and did, contemporaneously sentence Scanes as a habitual felony offender. *1022 “Magic words” are not necessary to establish what the sentencing court intended.’ ”) (quoting Scanes v. State, 876 So.2d 1238, 1239-40 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2004)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cook v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also President v. State, 884 So.2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), review denied, State v. West, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005) ( Miranda warning that failed to advise defendant of his right to counsel during interrogation was inadequate; erroneous admission of defendant's confession to robbery was not harmless).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROSS
v.
STATE
SC04-2462.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 4, 2005.
892 So. 2d 1014
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Decision without published opinion. Hab.Corp. Vol. dismissed.