Mitchell v. State, 911 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Mitchell v. State, 911 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Adams v. State (fla, 2008-03-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Adams v. State (2×)
Fla. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. State, 871 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review dismissed, 911 So.2d 93 (Fla.2005); Gessner v. State, 890 So.2d 565, 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
discussed Cited "see" Warren v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. State, 871 So.2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067, 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), for the proposition that "we will remand for reconsideration of the revocation order `when a substantial ground for revocation was reversed leaving only proof of the violation of a technical ground to support the revocation'"), review dismissed as improvidently granted, 911 So.2d 93 (Fla.2005).
Demetrius MITCHELL, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
SC04-873.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 1, 2005.
911 So. 2d 93
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with our decision in Woodson v. State, 889 So.2d 823 (Fla.2004), we conclude that review herein was improvidently granted, and we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.