green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Sutherland
See Ex parte Preston, 162 Tex. 379 , 347 S.W.2d 938 (1961); Marshall v. Marshall, supra. As the vested nature of relator’s retainer pay as a community asset is not *141 open to question and the court awarded ½ of that vested property to Mrs. Sutherland, it follows that the order for him to deliver Mrs. Sutherland’s share of such payments into court is neither an order to pay alimony nor a judgment for debt.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Votzmeyer v. Votzmeyer
See, e.g., Ex Parte Preston, 162 Tex. 379 , 347 S.W.2d 938, 940 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Vision Investments, Inc., Vision Village, Inc., Lakin D. Kirk, and Nancy J. Kirk
See, e.g., Ex parte Preston, 162 Tex. 379 , 347 S.W.2d 938, 942 (1961) (quoting Decker v. Decker, 52 Wash.2d 456 , 326 P.2d 332, 333 (1958), for the proposition that “[problems of domestic relations involving alimony, support payments, property settlements, together with court orders in connection therewith, do not normally fall into the debtor-creditor category.”); Ex parte Jackson, 590 S.W.2d 775, 776 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1979, no writ) (holding that a divorce judgment ordering a husband to pay $5000 in past community debts could not be enforced by a contempt judgment because it conce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clendenin v. Krock
(2×)
See also Ex parte Preston, 162 Tex. 379 , 347 S.W.2d 938 (1961); Marks v. Marks, 470 S.W.2d 83 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1971, writ ref’d n. r. e.); McBean v. McBean, 371 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1963, no writ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berry Butler
v.
Leon Moten
v.
Leon Moten
No. A-8428.
Texas Supreme Court.
Jun 28, 1961.
347 S.W.2d 917
Berry Smither, Huntsville, for petitioners. Bennett Bennett, Huntsville, for respondents.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Since no motion for rehearing was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals as required by Rule 469(c), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, respondent’s motion to dismiss petitioners’ application for want of jurisdiction is granted, and the application for writ of error is dismissed. See State Board of Morticians v. Frank R. Cortez, 157 Tex. 649, 308 S.W. 2d 12.