green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard Peltier v. G.L. Henman, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
See President of the United States ex rel Caputo v. Kelly, 92 F.2d 603, 606 (2d Cir.1937) (“[ejxtradition proceedings must be prosecuted by the foreign government in the public interest, and may not be used by a private party for private vengeance or personal purposes”), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635 , 58 S.Ct. 521 , 82 L.Ed. 1096 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul Belton v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Wilson, 178 F.Supp. 881, 885 (D.D.C.1959) 4 at the same time it requested a reading of the testimony of the deceased's daughter and another eye witness 'regarding what transpired from the time of the entrance of the defendant and including the actual shooting.' (Tr. 376.) 5 Appellant's counsel say that the same flavor was communicated by the charge that reflection 'does not even require minutes.' That phrase appears in Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 170 , 94 F.2d 636, 639 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635 , 58 S.Ct. 523 , 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Bostic v. United States
(2×)
See also Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167 , 94 F.2d 636 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635 , 58 S.Ct. 523 , 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938); Bostic v. Rives, 71 App.D.C. 2 , 107 F.2d 649 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 664 , 60 S.Ct. 593 , 84 L.Ed. 1011 (1940).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henderson
(2×)
Deliberation and Premeditation : See, e. g., Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 169-170 , 94 F.2d 636, 638-639 , certiorari denied, 303 U.S. 635 , 58 S.Ct. 523 , 82 L.Ed. 1095 .
Bostic
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1938.
Mr. Sol M. Alpher for petitioner. No appearance for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.