green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1940 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1940
1983
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United States
A divided panel of the Sixth Circuit affirmed a demurrer to the complaint and the Supreme Court summarily affirmed the judgment, but solely on the grounds that the district court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. 308 U.S. at 516, 60 S.Ct. at 170 . 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Deadwood, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue
See Leonard v. Maxwell, 216 N.C. 89, 93 , 3 S.E.2d 316, 319 , appeal dismissed, 308 U.S. 516 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherwood
See Franklin v. United States, 308 U. S. 516 ; Otis Elevator *592 Co. v. United States, 18 F. Supp. 87 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterman v. Department of Natural Resources
See also Franklin v United States, 101 F2d 459, 463 (CA 6, 1939), aff’d on other grounds 308 US 516 ; 60 S Ct 170 ; 84 L Ed 439 (1939); Latourette v United States, 150 F Supp 123, 126 (D Or, 1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tamulion v. State Waterways Commission
See, also, fn 9. 12 See Franklin v United States, 101 F2d 459 (CA 6, 1939), aff'd on other grounds 308 US 516 ; 60 S Ct 170 ; 84 L Ed 439 (1939); W H Ross Construction Co v Yearsley, 103 F2d 589 (CA 8, 1939); Pitman v United States, supra; Latourette v United States, 150 F Supp 123 (D Or, 1957); Miramar Co v Santa Barbara, supra; 4 Waters and Water Rights (Clark Ed), § 306.3(D), p 170. 13 See Gibson v United States, 166 US 269 ; 17 S Ct 578 ; 41 L Ed 996 (1897); United States v Commodore Park, Inc, 324 US 386 ; 65 S Ct 803 ; 89 L Ed 1017 (1945); United States v Rands, 389 US 121 ; 88 S Ct 265…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leonard, Trading as Community Variety Store
v.
Maxwell, Commissioner of Revenue
v.
Maxwell, Commissioner of Revenue
No. 447.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1939.
Mr. J. M. Wells, Jr. for appellant. Mr. Harry McMullan for appellee.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 93-95; Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495, 509-510; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 578-581. (2) Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447, 457; Darnell v. Indiana, 226 U. S. 390, 398.