Boucher v. Sola, 318 U.S. 770 (1943). · Go Syfert
Boucher v. Sola, 318 U.S. 770 (1943). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roberts v. All American Engineering Co. (njsuperctappdiv, 1968-12-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Roberts v. All American Engineering Co.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hitt v. Cardillo, 76 U.S. App. D.C. 334 , 131 F.2d 233 , certiorari denied, 318 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 760 , 87 L.Ed. 1140 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Dyer
D.C. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hammond v. Hammond, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 357 , 131 F.2d 351 (1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 763 , 87 L.Ed. 1141 (1943); Soltow v. Soltow, 47 A.D.2d 652 , 364 N.Y.S.2d 28 (1975); Ex parte Holloway, 490 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.Civ.App.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Puig v. Standard Dredging Corporation
1st Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hitt v. Cardillo, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 334 , 131 F.2d 233 (1942), Cert. denied, 318 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 760 , 87 L.Ed. 1140 (1943); Norton v. Travelers Insurance Co., 105 F.2d 122 (3d Cir. 1939). 6 This is not the first time that a death benefits amendment under the Longshoremen's Act has been attacked on retroactivity grounds.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Puig v. Standard Dredging Corp.
1st Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hitt v. Cardillo, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 334, 131 F.2d 233 (1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 760 , 87 L.Ed. 1140 (1943); Norton v. Travelers Insurance Co., 105 F.2d 122 (3d Cir. 1939).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boucher
v.
Sola
No. 673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1943.
318 U.S. 770
Messrs. Herbert S. Ward and Scott D. Kellogg for petitioners. Messrs. J. Bernhard Thiess and Leslie W. Friclie for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.