green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McKinley v. Afram Lines (USA) Co., Ltd.
In all such cases the plaintiff must prove that the assailant constituted a foreseeable risk to the plaintiff against which the shipowner had a duty to guard. 1A Ellen Flynn, Dale Cooper & Gina Ra-duazzo Benedict on Admiralty § 31, p. 3-247 & n. 14 (1993) (collecting cases); see Koehler v. Presque-Isle Transportation Co., 141 F.2d 490, 491-492 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 764 , 64 S.Ct. 1288 , 88 L.Ed. 1591 (1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D.M.C.
See Gaston v. United States, 34 A.2d 353, 356 (D.C.1943), aff'd, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 37 , 143 F.2d 10 , cert. denied, 322 U.S. 764 , 64 S.Ct. 1286 , 88 L.Ed. 1591 (1944); Williams v. Overholser, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 235 , 151 F.2d 457 (1945), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 808 , 66 S.Ct. 957 , 90 L.Ed. 1032 (1946); Labofish v. Berman, 60 App.D.C. 397, 399 , 55 F.2d 1022, 1024 (1932); United States v. Kuhn, 4 D.C. (4 Cranch) 401 , 419 (1833).
discussed
Cited "see"
West Coast Credit Corp. v. Renfro
In Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles v. United States, 9 Cir., 1943, 135 F.2d 527 , a government tax lien filed in 1931 was held enforceable and entitled to priority over the subsequent lien of a judgment creditor as to property the taxpayer acquired in 1938; accord, Nelson v. United States, 9 Cir., 1943, 139 F.2d 162 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 764 , 64 S.Ct. 1287 , 88 L.Ed. 1591 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blohm v. District of Columbia
See Powers v. United States, supra; Smith v. United States, 5 Cir., 288 F. 44 ; see also Gaston v. United States, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 37 , 143 F.2d 10 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 764 , 64 S.Ct. 1286 , 88 L.Ed. 1591 . 4 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Laffal
See also Sheehan v. Huff, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 391 , 142 F.2d 81 , certiorari denied, 322 U.S. 764 , 64 S.Ct. 1287 , 88 L.Ed. 1591 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gaston
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1944.
Mr. P. Bateman Ennis for petitioner., Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.