green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric Company
(2×)
But see William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 69 F.Supp. 103, 105 (E.D.Pa.1946), petition for leave to file a bill of review denied, 163 F.2d 241 (3 Cir. 1947), aff’d per curiam, 164 F.2d 1021 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter Corporation
(2×)
See Palmer v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, 164 F.2d 466, 468 (2d Cir.1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948) (where Judge Learned Hand stated that the rule against reversing upon a ground not raised below has greater force where the issue is raised for the first time in a reply brief). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
(2×)
See, William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 69 F.Supp. 103, 105 (E.D.Pa.1946) aff’d, 164 F.2d 1021 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norton Company, Appellant-Cross v. Carborundum Company, Appellee-Cross
(2×)
See United States v. Cold Metal Process Co., 62 F.Supp. 127, 140 (N.D.Ohio 1945), aff’d, 164 F.2d 754 (6th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glaxo Group Limited
(2×)
See United States v. Cold Metal Process Co., 57 F.Supp. 317 (N.D.Ohio 1944), aff'd 164 F.2d 754 (6th Cir. 1947), cert. denied 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948), rehearing denied 334 U.S. 835 , 68 S.Ct. 1343 , 92 L.Ed. 1761 (1948). 90 . 3A Moore, Federal Practice, K 21.05, at 2909 (2d Ed. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mott Corp. v. Sunflower Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Cold Metal Process Co., 164 F.2d 754 (6th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948); United States v. Standard Electric Time Company, 155 F.Supp. 949 (D.Mass.1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
(2×)
Lehrman v. Gulf Oil Co., 500 F.2d 659, 668 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 929 , 95 S.Ct. 1128 , 43 L.Ed.2d 400 (1975); see also William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc., 69 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.Pa.1946), aff'd per curiam, 164 F.2d 1021 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Insurance
(2×)
Lehrman v. Gulf Oil Co., 500 F.2d 659, 668 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 929 , 95 S.Ct. 1128 , 43 L.Ed.2d 400 (1975); see also William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 69 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.Pa.1946), aff'd per curiam, 164 F.2d 1021 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klein v. American Luggage Works, Inc.
(2×)
Compare William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 150 F.2d 738 (3 Cir. 1945), 164 F.2d 1021 (3 Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 811 , 68 S.Ct. 1016 , 92 L.Ed. 1742 (1948), a private antitrust proceeding where the principles of Interstate Circuit, op. dt. supra, were applied to find concerted action with ■ an intent to monopolize and exclude plaintiff from competition in the exhibition of first-run Warner Bros, films in Philadelphia.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loew's, Inc.
v.
William Goldman Theatres, Inc.
v.
William Goldman Theatres, Inc.
No. 611.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1948.
Wm. A. Schnader, Bernard G. Segal, J. Pennington Straus, Joseph M. Proskauer and Louis J. Gofjman for petitioners. William A. Gray, Francis T. Anderson, Lester J. Schaffer and Robert Dechert for respondent.
Published
C. C. A. 3d. Certiorari denied.