Universal Oil Prods. Co. v. William Whitman Co., 335 U.S. 912 (1949). · Go Syfert
Universal Oil Prods. Co. v. William Whitman Co., 335 U.S. 912 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sandra Lou Southerland v. Frank Irons, Richard L. Wolk, Michigan Department of Social Services (ca6, 1980-08-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sandra Lou Southerland v. Frank Irons, Richard L. Wolk, Michigan Department of Social Services
6th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 169 F.2d 514, 522-25 (3d Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 481 , 93 L.Ed. 444 (1949); United States v. International Telephone & Tel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Andersen v. Roszkowski
N.D. Ill. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 580 , 66 S.Ct. 1176 , 1179, 90 L.Ed. 1447 (1946), on remand Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 169 F.2d 514 (3rd Cir.1948), cert. denied sub nom, Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co., 335 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 481 , 93 L.Ed. 444 (1949).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Universal Oil Products Co.
v.
William Whitman Co., Inc. and American Safety Table Co. v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.
Nos. 439 and 440; No. 441.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1949.
335 U.S. 912
Ralph S. Harris, John R. McCullough and Adam M. Byrd for petitioner in Nos. 439 and 440. Edwin M. Ot-terbourg, Leon J. Obermayer and Charles A. Houston for petitioner in No. 441. Leslie Nichols for the William Whitman Co., respondent in Nos. 439 and 440; and Newton A. Burgess and John F. Ryan for respondent in No. 441. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Alfred C. Aurich, Paul A. Sweeney and Melvin Richter filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, opposing the petitions.
Cited by 27 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 169 F. 2d 514.