green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Loew's, Inc. v. United States
Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.” [The order is reported as amended in the bound volume of 339 U. S. at p. 974.]
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William E. Klein, Jr.
See Pritchard v. United States, 181 F.2d 326, 330-31 (6th Cir. 1950), aff’d, 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S.Ct. 1029 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 .
cited
Cited "see"
Russ Togs, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation
See United States v. Loew’s, Inc., 1950-1951 CCH Trade Cas. ¶ 62573 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S.Ct. 1032 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 (1950).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Meade
See Prichard v. United States (C.A.6 1950), 181 F.2d 326 , affirmed 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S. Ct. 1029 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 .
cited
Cited "see"
Eagle Lion Studios, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.
See United States v. Loew’s Inc. et al., Equity No. 87-273, S.D.N.Y., filed Feb. 8, 1950, affirmed 1950, 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S.Ct. 1032 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 .
cited
Cited "see"
Eagle Lion Studios v. Loew's
See United States v. Loew's Inc. et al., Equity No. 87-273, S.D.N.Y., filed Feb. 8, 1950, affirmed 1950, 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S.Ct. 1032 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marrelli
See Prichard v. United States, 181 F2d 326 (CA 6th Cir), affirmed 339 US 974 ; United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation, 89 F Supp 357 (DC Mass).
discussed
Cited "see"
J. J. Theatres, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
See U. S. v. Paramount Pictures, D.C., 66 F.Supp. 323 , affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded, 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 , and U. S. v. Paramount Pictures, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 881 , affirmed 339 U.S. 974 , 70 S.Ct. 1032 , 94 L.Ed. 1380 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loew's, Inc.
v.
United States Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. United States Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. United States and United States v. Loew's, Inc.
v.
United States Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. United States Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. United States and United States v. Loew's, Inc.
No. 844; No. 845; No. 846; No. 847.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1950.
John W. Davis, J. Robert Rubin and S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. for appellant in No. 844., Joseph M. Proskauer and Robert W. Perkins for Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al., appellants in No. 845., James F. Byrnes, Otto E. Koegel, John F. Caskey and Frederick W. R. Pride for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. et al., appellants in No. 846., Solicitor General Perlman for the United States, appellant in No. 847.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Per Curiam:The judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.