green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallatin Housing Authority v. Talley (In Re Talley)
See Dickson v. Irving Trust Co. (In re McCrory Stores Corp.), 69 F.2d 517, 518 (2d Cir.1934) (The trustee’s right in a leasehold is “an option to acquire title if acquisition should seem to the trustee best for the estate.”), quoted in Fletcher v. Surprise (In re Northern Indiana Oil Co., Inc.), 180 F.2d 669, 676 (7th Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 824 , 71 S.Ct. 58 , 95 L.Ed. 605 (1950); In re Westview 74th Street Drug Corp., 59 B.R. 747, 754 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986) (“The aim of the statutory authority to assume a lease is to assist in the debt- or’s reorganization effort.”). *222…
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Melrose Park National Bank (In Re Crystal Manufacturing & Packaging, Inc.)
See Fletcher v. Surprise, 180 F.2d 669, 678 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 824 , 71 S.Ct. 58 , 95 L.Ed. 605 (1950) (no summary jurisdiction where trustee failed to assume lease). 3 The trustee was aware of this lease, and the court concludes that his failure to assume it was not inadvertent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leo M. And Genevieve B. Rayhill, D/B/A Leo M. Rayhill Company v. The United States
See Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 179 F.2d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 1950) cert. denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Conasauga River Lumber Co. v. Wade, 221 F.2d 312, 315 (6th Cir., 1955) cert. denied, 350 U.S. 949 , 76 S.Ct. 324 , 100 L.Ed. 827 (1956); Thor Company v. United States, 173 F.Supp. 65, 68-69 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York
See Lansden v. Hart, 7 Cir.1950, 180 F.2d 679 , cert. denied, 1950, 340 U.S. 824 , 71 S.Ct. 58 , 95 L.Ed. 606 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harvey v. Levine
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 60S; Blaw-Knox Co. v. I.
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Cody v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
See Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 8 Cir., 179 F.2d 882 , certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 , and United States v. Kane, 8 Cir., 171 F.2d 54 , where various factors were considered. 10 With the foregoing controlling principles in mind, and in order to determine whether the Secretary's findings are supported by substantial evidence, we turn to the pertinent facts, which were established from uncontroverted evidence in the form of documents, statements, letters and the oral testimony of Dr. Cody adduced at the hearing before the referee. 4 In summa…
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Cody v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
See Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 8 Cir., 179 F.2d 882 , certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 , and United States v. Kane, 8 Cir., 171 F.2d 54 , where various factors were considered.
cited
Cited "see"
England v. Deere & Co.
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Blaw-Knox Co. v. I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Application of Alexander M. Wright
(2×)
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Blaw-Knox Co. v. I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger Corporation
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Blaw Knox Co. v. Lain Co., 7 Cir., 230 F.2d 373 .” The late Chief Judge Parker, of the Fourth Circuit, in Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, Inc., 4 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 855 , 861, expressed the issue as follows: “The real question as to the validity of the patent is not one of anticipation or of prior use but of invention.
cited
Cited "see"
Weller Manufacturing Co. v. Wen Products, Inc.
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Blaw-Knox Co. v. Lain Co., 7 Cir., 230 F.2d 373 .
cited
Cited "see"
Weller Manufacturing Company v. Wen Products, Incorporated
See Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Blaw-Knox Co. v. Lain Co., 7 Cir., 230 F.2d 373 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bishop v. United States
(2×)
See Lansden v. Hart, 7 Cir., 168 F.2d 409 , certiorari denied 335 U.S. 858 , 69 S.Ct. 132 , 93 L.Ed. 405 , Id., 7 Cir., 180 F.2d 679 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 824 , 71 S.Ct. 58 , 95 L.Ed. 606 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Locations, Inc. v. Hawai'i Department of Labor & Industrial Relations
See, e.g., Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 179 F.2d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 (1950); Commonwealth v. Savage, 31 Mass.App. 714 , 583 N.E.2d 276 (1991); Edwards v. Caulfield, 560 So.2d 364, 372 (1990); Henry Broderick, Inc. v. Squire, 163 F.2d 980, 982-983 (9th Cir.1947); Schoenberg, 117 So.2d at 541-43 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce A. Kock v. The Quaker Oats Company
Inferences favoring the defendants which are "encouraged" by the evidence are irrelevant to this court's review of a summary judgment decision favoring the defendants since "all doubt must be resolved in favor of the party opposing the motion for summary judgment." Cermetek, Inc. v. Butler Avpak, Inc., 573 F.2d 1370, 1377 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Pegasus, 617 F.2d at 1339 4 For example, in Baker-Commack Hosiery Mills Inc. v. Davis Co., 181 F.2d 550 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 824 , 71 S.Ct. 58 , 95 L.Ed. 605 (1950), the Fourth Circuit upheld the patent after such a transfer because "th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blaw-Knox Company v. I. D. Lain Company (Inc.)
See also Lewyt Corp. v. Health-Mor, Inc., 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 855 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 823 , 71 S.Ct. 57 , 95 L.Ed. 605 ; Helms Products, Inc., v. Lake Shore Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nangle, Circuit Court Judge
v.
Missouri ex rel. Taylor, Attorney General
v.
Missouri ex rel. Taylor, Attorney General
No. 184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1950.
Morris A. Shenker for petitioner. J. E. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, Arthur M. O’Keefe and Robert R. Welborn, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.