United States v. Bloom, 342 U.S. 912 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Bloom, 342 U.S. 912 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
100 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York (nyed, 1976-07-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pavone Textile Corporation v. Bloom, 195 Misc. 702 , 90 N.Y.S.2d 785 (Sup.Ct.1949), aff’d. 302 N.Y. 206 , 97 N.E.2d 755 , aff’d. 342 U.S. 912 , 72 S.Ct. 357 , 96 L.Ed. 682 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Bloom United States v. Edens, Trustees United States v. General Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
No. 100; No. 299; No. 300.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1952.
342 U.S. 912
I. Henry Kutz argued the, cause in No. 100, and John F. Davis argued the causes in Nos. 299 and 300, for the United States. With them on the briefs were Solicitor General Perlmans and Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack. Helen Goodner was also with them on the brief in No. 100. Henry Hammer argued the cause arid filed a brief for respondents in No. 299. James S. McClellan argued the cause, and George C. Willson filed a brief, for respondent in No. 300. Irwin Geiger submitted on brief for respondent in No. 100.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgments are affirmed. City of New York v. Saper, 336 U. S. 328.