Sexton v. Barry, 352 U.S. 870 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Sexton v. Barry, 352 U.S. 870 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
171 citation events across 51 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnny Smith v. Marjorie Donohue, Michael W. Carter, Felissa M. Newberry (ca7, 1992-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Johnny Smith v. Marjorie Donohue, Michael W. Carter, Felissa M. Newberry
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duling v. Markun, 231 F.2d 833 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 870 (1956). 8 Smith also contends that the district court erred by allowing the defendants to respond to his summary judgment motion and his default motions long after these motions had been filed.
discussed Cited "see" R. Anthony Marrese and Michael R. Treister v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2×)
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shibley v. United States, 236 F.2d 238,240 (9th Cir.1956), cert, denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 77 (1956) (abuse of discretion standard of review); Jewel Tea Co. v. Kraus, 204 F.2d 549, 551 (7th Cir.1953) (same).
cited Cited "see" United States v. David E. Thompson, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monroe v. United States, 234 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Canella v. United States, 157 F.2d 470 (9th Cir. 1946).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Anthony Ricco, A/K/A \Tony Bragiole\""
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See S.Rep.No.1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. (1968), quoted in 2 [1968] U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at pp. 2188-89 and discussed infra. Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 235, 236 , 234 F.2d 49, 56, 57 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956), dealt with a similar issue under § 605 of the Communications Act.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Angelo Bertolotti (2×)
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monroe v. United States, 234 F.2d 49 , 53, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); United States v. Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue Service (2×)
6th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sexton v. Barry, 233 F.2d 220 , 223, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeod, 235 F.Supp. 276 (E.D.S.C.1964), aff’d 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leonard Aiken, Charles Cole, Leroy Davis and Clifford Rogers
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, e. g., Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 234 F.2d 49 , 57, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 872 , 873, 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); United States v. Perl, 210 F.2d 457 (2 Cir. 1954); Orfield, Relief From Prejudicial Joinder in Federal Criminal Cases (Part II.), 36 Notre Dame Law, 495, 499 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. Aldabe
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Duling v. Markun, 231 F.2d 833 (CA7 1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 ; Georgia Power Project v. Georgia Power Co., 409 F.Supp. 332, 336-37 (N.D.Ga.1975); Ciccarello v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 1 F.R.D. 491, 493-94 (S.D.W.Va.1940).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Green v. Karol
Ind. Ct. App. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Duling v. Markun (7th Cir. 1956), 231 F.2d 833 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 ; Papagianakis v. The Samos (4th Cir. 1950), 186 F.2d 257 , cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 741 , 95 L.Ed. 1354 (1951).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wynder v. Lonergan
Ind. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
Evidentiary trial restrictions such as being bound by the answers of your witness and failing to object to unresponsive answers are not part of the discovery procedures. 8 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2152, at 472; see also Duling v. Markun (7th Cir. 1956), 231 F. 2d 833 (cert. den. 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S. Ct. 96 , 1 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rosenberg
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 234 F.2d 49, 55 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." England v. Deere & Company
S.D. Ill. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. v. Sel-O-Rak Corp., 5 Cir., 270 F.2d 635, 644 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 95 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 76 ; Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., 5 Cir., 253 F.2d 72, 74 , cert. denied 358 U.S. 817 , 79 S.Ct. 28 , 3 L.Ed.2d 59 ; Hartford Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. E.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sexton
v.
Barry
No. 242.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1956.
352 U.S. 870
Petitioner pro se. Thomas O. Nevi-son for Barry, respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.