Neches River Conservation Dist. v. Seeman, 358 U.S. 820 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Neches River Conservation Dist. v. Seeman, 358 U.S. 820 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion (texag, 1984-07-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Tex. Att'y Gen. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1958). cert. denied, 358 U.S.820nderson v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1958). cert. denied 358 U.S. 820 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Opinion No.
Tex. Att'y Gen. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 820 (1958); Anderson v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 820 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neches River Conservation District
v.
Seeman, Division Engineer
No. 121.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1958.
358 U.S. 820
J. Chrys Dougherty, Thomas Gibbs Gee, Robert J. Hearon, Jr. and Ireland Graves for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and David R. Warner for respondents.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.