green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Omaha v. Centennial Park, LLC
See Shell v. Schmidt, 164 Cal. App. 2d 350 , 330 P.2d 817 (1958), cert. denied 359 U.S. 959 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial Cabinet Co. v. Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc.
See Shell v. Schmidt, 330 P.2d 817 (Cal.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 959 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of Joseph A. Schafer, Whitney W. Irons, Alton P. Gainer, Emil Milan, Carol Kuchar, Leo Sukala, Stephen Sloboda, Charles W. Hannon, and Philip Morton, in Nos. 78-1715, 78-2321 and 78-2336. In the Matter of Penn Central Company, Debtor
See Peckham v. Casalduc, 261 F.2d 120, 121 (1st Cir. 1958), Cert. denied, 359 U.S. 958 , 79 S.Ct. 798 , 3 L.Ed.2d 766 (1959) (Chapter X Reorganization)." In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 455 F.2d 811 , 815 n. 10 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 407 U.S. 915 , 92 S.Ct. 2440 , 32 L.Ed.2d 690 (1972). 22 Having exhausted appellants' list of arguments in opposition to the motion to dismiss, we are left with the conclusion that appellants do not have standing to appeal orders of the reorganization court and, therefore, that the motion to dismiss must be granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
See Peckham v. Casalduc, 261 F.2d 120, 121 (1st Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 958 , 79 S.Ct. 798 , 3 L.Ed.2d 766 (1959) (Chapter X Reorganization).” In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 455 F.2d 811 , 815 n. 10 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 915 , 92 S.Ct. 2440 , 32 L.Ed.2d 690 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company First Mortgage 4% Bondholders Committee
See Peckham v. Casalduc, 261 F.2d 120, 121 (1st Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 958 , 79 S.Ct. 798 , 3 L.Ed.2d 766 (1959) (Chapter X Reorganization) 11 Section 77(c) (13) also provides that "upon petition therefor and cause shown . . . any other interested party may be permitted to intervene." The New Haven Committee, however, did not petition to intervene, so that it cannot claim a right to appeal as an intervenor.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
See Peckham v. Casalduc, 261 F.2d 120, 121 (1st Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 958 , 79 S.Ct. 798 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 766 (1959) (Chapter X Reorganization) . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Warren G. Goldsmith v. United States of America, Earl L. Carter v. United States
(2×)
See Heideman v. United States, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 128 , 259 F.2d 943 , certiorari denied 1959, 359 U.S. 959 , 79 S.Ct. 800 , 3 L.Ed.2d 767 ; Mallory v. United States, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 259 F.2d 796 ; Metoyer v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 62 , 250 F.2d 30 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvin R. Campbell v. United States of America, Arnold S. Campbell v. United States of America, Donald Lester v. United States
(2×)
See Lewis v. United States, D.C.Cir.1959, 263 F.2d 265 , certiorari denied 359 U.S. 959 , 79 S.Ct. 798 , 3 L.Ed.2d 766 ; O’Malley v. United States, 1 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 332, 334 , certiorari denied 1956, 350 U.S. 966 , 76 S.Ct. 434 , 100 L.Ed. 838 ; Miller v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 372, 374 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLC
See also Shell v. Schmidt, 164 Cal App 2d 350, 366, 330 P2d 817, 827 (1958), cert den, 359 US 959 (1959); P. G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrulis v. Levin Construction Corp.
Id.; see also Shell v. Schmidt, 164 Cal.App.2d 350 , 330 P.2d 817, 827 (1958) (holding that the breaching contractor has the burden “to affirmatively and convincingly prove that economic waste would result [and that] a substantial part of what has been done must be undone”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 959 , 79 S.Ct. 799 , 3 L.Ed.2d 766 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bethea v. United States
See, e. g., Heidemam v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 128 , 131, 259 F.2d 943, 946 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 959 , 79 S.Ct. 800 , 3 L.Ed.2d 767 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Calvin L. Ricks v. United States
Compare, Heideman v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 128 , 130-131, 259 F.2d 943, 945-946 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 959 , 79 S.Ct. 800 , 3 L.Ed.2d 767 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter Dunn v. Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad
See also Byrne v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 3 Cir., 1958, 262 P.2d 906, 911 , as amended on denial of rehearing 1959, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 798 . 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hicks
v.
Summerfield, Postmaster General
v.
Summerfield, Postmaster General
No. 715.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1959.
Richard A.'Mehler and George J. Goldsborough, Jr., for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Morton Hollander for respondents.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.