green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Berryman
See, e.g., Douglas v. California, 372 *361 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); United States v. Johnson, 732 F.2d 379 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1033 , 105 S.Ct. 505 , 83 L.Ed.2d 396 (1984); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS ET AL.
v.
ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL.
v.
ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL.
Nos. 526, 527 and 528.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1960.
361 U.S. 353
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA.
Byron M. Gray for appellants in No. 526.
R. W. Henriott and M. L. Cassell for appellants in No. 527.
Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for appellant in No. 528.
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Donald Macleay, George Shuff, John A. Caddell and Charles J. McCarthy for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
[*] Together with No. 527, Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. et al. v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., and No. 528, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., also on appeals from the same Court.