green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Connecticut Fund for Environment v. Job Plating Co.
See Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp., 269 F.2d 785, 788-89 (2d Cir.1959) (Section 2462 applies only to actions brought on behalf of the United States and qui tarn actions), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 960 , 80 S.Ct. 585 , 4 L.Ed.2d 542 (1960); but cf. Friends of the Earth, supra, 618 F.Supp. 532 , 22 Env’t Rep.Cas.
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. MEBA Pension Trust
See Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp., 269 F.2d 785, 788-89 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 960 , 80 S.Ct. 585 , 4 L.Ed.2d 542 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hobbs
See also Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp., 269 F.2d 785, 788 (2d Cir.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 960 , 80 S.Ct. 585 , 4 L.Ed.2d 542 (1960) (Section 2462 applies only to actions brought by the United States and qui tarn actions on behalf of the United States.). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People Ex Rel. Fahner v. Climatemp, Inc.
A comment by Judge Learned Hand, referring to the Federal treble damages action, is here apropos: “The remedy provided is not solely civil; two thirds of the recovery is not remedial and inevitably presupposes a punitive purpose.” Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. (2d Cir. 1955), 222 F.2d 184 , 189; see also Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp. (2d Cir. 1959), 269 F.2d 785, 789 , cert. denied (1960), 361 U.S. 960 , 4 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Co.
See Sullivan v. Associated Billposters, etc., 2 Cir., 6 F.2d at page 1009 , 42 A.L.R. 603 ; see also Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp., 2 Cir., 1959, 269 F.2d 785, 788-789 , certiorari denied 1960, 361 U.S. 960 , 80 S.Ct. 585 , 4 L.Ed.2d 542 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Castiel
v.
Superior Court of California, in and for the Clty and County of San Francisco
v.
Superior Court of California, in and for the Clty and County of San Francisco
No. 457.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1960.
Harry P. Olassman for petitioner. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Supremo Court of California. Certiorari denied.