green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Johnson
But cf. United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812 , 821-822 n. 7 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomison
See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 821 (2d Cir.) (interpreting Bowman as saying that Rule 17(c) permits pretrial production if it is necessary for the moving party to use the material as evidence at trial), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962). 14 In sum, the fact that a criminal defendant has both a right to the pre-trial production of evidence and a right to protect his trial strategy, contraindicates a noticed motion practice requiring disclosure to the gov-. ernment of the defendant’s theory of the ease as a precondition to obtaining subpoenas duces te…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cherry
See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 821 (2d Cir.1962) (“Rule 17(c) is a device solely for the obtaining of evidence for the use of the moving party, permitting him to examine the material obtained before trial only where ... it is necessary that he do so in order to make use of the material as evidence.”), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962); United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 577 (9th Cir. 1984) (court properly quashed subpoena seeking production of documents which would not have been admissible “under the limitations of Federal Rules of Evidence 80…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Moore
See Lewis v. Fitzgerald, 295 F.2d 877 (10th Cir.1961) cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Brown
See Zimmerman v. Montour Railroad Co., 296 F.2d 97, 98 (3d Cir. 1961) cert. denied 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cal-Am Corporation, and Counter-Defendant v. Joe Talley Spence, Joseph R. Laird, Jr., Third Party
See, Haynes v. Eagle-Picher Co., 295 F.2d 761 (10th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 846 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter A. Read v. Local Lodge 1284, International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers, Afl--Cio
See Richter v. United States, 296 F.2d 509, 510 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Read v. Local Lodge 1284, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
See Richter v. United States, 296 F.2d 509, 510 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Simione
P. 221. [6] Brief for Commonwealth at 1. [7] Williams v. Commonwealth, 91 Pa. 493, 502 (1880); see United States v. Murray, 297 F. 2d 812, 819 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S. Ct. 845 (1962); IV Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure § 1865 (Anderson ed. 1957). [8] Williams v. Commonwealth, 91 Pa. 493, 502 (1880); Commonwealth v. Hershman, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 134, 139 , 90 A. 2d 314, 317 , aff'd 374 Pa. 311 , 97 A. 2d 777 (1952); see United States v. Haskins, 345 F. 2d 111, 114 (6th Cir. 1965); United States v. Murray, 297 F. 2d 812, 819 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn Sayyed
We reject out of hand the claim that the testimony was admissible for the purpose of impeaching the testimony of Wood, the chief prosecution witness, by showing acts of misconduct not the subject of a prior criminal conviction. *15 Character impeachment by proof of misconduct not the subject of convictions is not only limited to cross-examination, see United States v. Masino, 275 F.2d 129, 133 (2d Cir. 1960); McCormick, supra § 49, at 89 & n. 21, but, in this circuit, “specific acts of misconduct not-resulting in conviction of a felony or crime of moral turpitude are not the ¡proper subjec…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosenberg
See United States v. Murray, 297 F.2d 812, 819-822 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., and the Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lambert Corporation
Accord, Zimmerman v. Montour R.R., 296 F.2d 97 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962); Weber v. McKee, 215 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1954). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyer v. Davis (In Re U.S.A. Diversified Products, Inc.)
Thus, a summary turnover order could be and usually was enforced by contempt proceedings. 5A Remington on Bankruptcy, § 2457 at 264; see also, Matter of Glostex Products, Inc., 295 F.2d 324, 325 (7th Cir.1961) (whether or not an order is a turnover order is determined by the nature of the remedy contemplated), cer t. denied, Klein v. Herman, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 846 , 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Five Platters, Inc.
See, e. g., Nugent v. Yellow Cab Co., 295 F.2d 794 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 844 , 7 L.Ed.2d 793 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold W. Grausam, Jr. v. Henry S. Murphey, M.D., Individually and as Medical Director of Henry Landis State Hospital
See also Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959). 10 . 296 F.2d 97, 98 (3rd Cir. 1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 828 , 82 S.Ct. 845 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 793 (1962). 11 . 71 P.P.S. § 741.1 et seq. 12 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nugent
v.
Yellow Cab Co.
v.
Yellow Cab Co.
No. 673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1962.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan and Peter Fitzpatrick for petitioner., Charles D. Snewind iov respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.