Soblen v. United States, 370 U.S. 944 (1962). · Go Syfert
Soblen v. United States, 370 U.S. 944 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria, Decor by Nikkei International, Inc., D/B/A Nikkei International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Chenax Majesty, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. East Europe Import-Export, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees (ca2, 1981-04-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poss v. Lieberman, 299 F.2d 358 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Cti 1585, 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962). .
discussed Cited "see" James H. Hampton v. United States
10th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
A similar observation is found in United States v. Purin, 486 F.2d 1363 , 1368 n. 2 (2nd Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 930 , 94 S.Ct. 2640 , 41 L.Ed.2d 233 (1974): Even where evidence falls within the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), however, the Government need not sua sponte give notice to the defense where the accused has knowledge of the evidence (Wallace v. Hocker, 441 F.2d 219, 220 (9th Cir. 1971); see United States v. Soblen, 301 F.2d 236, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied. 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962)) and here no pre…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nicholas Vowteras and Nestor Vowteras
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soblen, 203 F.Supp. 542, 565 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d, 301 F.2d 236, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962); United States v. Passero, 290 F.2d 238, 244 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 819 , 82 S.Ct. 36 , 7 L.Ed.2d 25 (1961). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Flora Purin and Ernani Da Silva
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
Even where evidence falls within the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), however, the Government need not sua sponte give notice to the defense where the accused has knowledge of the evidence (Wallace v. Hocker, 441 F.2d 219, 220 (9th Cir. 1971) ; see United States v. Soblen, 301 F.2d 236, 242 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 370 U. S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962)) and here no pretrial discovery motions were made.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Olander Tuck
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Soblen, 301 F.2d 236, 242 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962).
cited Cited "see" Clifton Gregory v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soblen, S.D.N.Y., 203 F.Supp. 542 and cases cited at 552 (1901), affirmed, 2 Cir., 301 F.2d 236 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Linds Agurs, United States of America v. Linda v. Agurs, (Two Cases)
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Soblen, 301 F.2d 236 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962); United States v. Fabric Garment Co., 262 F.2d 631 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1117 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959). 13 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. Shuck (2×)
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Soblen, supra, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 203 F.Supp. 542, 568 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 1962, 301 F.2d 236 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 810 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Soblen
v.
United States
No. 957.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1962.
370 U.S. 944
Ephraim London and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeag-ley and Kevin T. Maroney for the United States. William E. Haudek for Dr. Bernard Diamond et al. Norman Dorsen and Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The motion of Dr. Bernard Diamond et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.