green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Field v. United States
See Courtesy Sandwich Shops v. Port of New York Authority, 12 N.Y. 2d 379 , 240 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 190 N.E.2d 402 (1963), appeal denied for want of a substantial Fed. question, 375 U.S. 78 , 84 S.Ct. 194 , 11 L.Ed.2d 141 (1963); In Matter of the Port of New York Authority (World Trade Center), 18 N.Y.2d 250 , 273 N.Y.S.2d 337 , 219 N.E.2d 797 (1966), cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COURTESY SANDWICH SHOP, INC., ET AL.
v.
PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY ET AL.
v.
PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY ET AL.
399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1963.
375 U.S. 78
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
Edward S. Greenbaum, Morris L. Ernst, Leo Rosen, W. Bernard Richland and Jerome M. Alper for appellants.
Sidney Goldstein and Daniel B. Goldberg for appellees.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.