green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Company, Inc.
See Maryland Casualty Co. v. Armco, Inc., 822 F.2d at 1353,citing Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla.1962) (restoration of strip-mined land cost four times its potential value), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963); cf. Jack L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.
See Maryland Casualty Co. v. Armco, Inc., 822 F.2d at 1353, citing Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla.1962) (restoration of strip-mined land cost four times its potential value), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963); cf. Jack L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berkshire Medical Center, Inc. v. U.W. Marx, Inc.
Restatement (Second) of Contracts, supra note 2, § 348(2) & cmt. c; see, e.g., Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109, 111-14 (Okla.1962) (cost of remedying fault exceeded difference in market value), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963); Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent, 230 N.Y. 239 , 129 N.E. 889, 890-91 (1921) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Travelers Insurance v. Ross Electric of Washington, Inc.
See, e.g., Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla.1962), cert denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963) (cost of restoration of strip-mined land more than quadruple the value of the restored land).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Maryland Casualty Company v. Armco, Inc.
See, e.g., Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla.1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963) (where the cost of restoring strip-mined land was more than quadruple its potential value in the restored condition). 22 Second, even assuming that the costs to the defendant are the same regardless of whether the government sues for restitution or for damages, thus in some sense rendering the decision by the government regarding whether to sue for damages or restitution a "mere fortuity," it is a great step, and a dangerous one, for courts to begin to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Armco, Inc.
See, e.g., Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla.1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 196 , 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963) (where the cost of restoring strip-mined land was more than quadruple its potential value in the restored condition).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peevyhouse et ux.
v.
Garland Coal & Mining Co.
v.
Garland Coal & Mining Co.
No. 405.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1963.
Leslie L. Conner and James M. Little for petitioners. M. A. Looney for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied.