green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Boise Cascade Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See Complaint, Boise Cascade Corp., FTC No. 9133 (Apr. 23, 1980), Joint Appendix ("J.A.") at 3-4. 7 In issuing the complaint, the Commission directed the Administrative Law Judge to receive evidence and to make findings of fact sufficient for disposition of the case under the competing standards of two FTC cases, namely Mueller Co., 60 F.T.C. 120 (1962), aff'd, 323 F.2d 44 (7th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 (1964), and an earlier FTC case that Mueller had overruled, Doubleday & Co., 52 F.T.C. 169 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WSOU Investments LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
See Mays v. U.S. Postal Service, 122 F.3d 43, 46 (11th Cir. 1997) (“the court should not grant the motion absent some showing that the evidence was not available during the pendency of the motion.”) (emphasis added); see also Engelhard Indus. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347, 352 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 (1964) (on a motion to reconsider a party is “obliged to show not only that this evidence was newly discovered or unknown to it until after the hearing, but also that it could not have discovered and produced such evidence at the hearing.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WSOU Investments LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
See Mays v. U.S. Postal Service, 122 F.3d 43, 46 (11th Cir. 1997) (“the court should not grant the motion absent some showing that the evidence was not available during the pendency of the motion.”) (emphasis added); see also Engelhard Indus. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347, 352 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 (1964) (on a motion to reconsider a party is “obliged to show not only that this evidence was newly discovered or unknown to it until after the hearing, but also that it could not have discovered and produced such evidence at the hearing.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WSOU Investments LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
See Mays v. U.S. Postal Service, 122 F.3d 43, 46 (11th Cir. 1997) (“the court should not grant the motion absent some showing that the evidence was not available during the pendency of the motion.”) (emphasis added); see also Engelhard Indus. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347, 352 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 (1964) (on a motion to reconsider a party is “obliged to show not only that this evidence was newly discovered or unknown to it until after the hearing, but also that it could not have discovered and produced such evidence at the hearing.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kersavage v. United States
See also Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347 (9th Cir.1963) cert. denied 377 U.S. 923 , 84 S.Ct. 1220 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Department of Transportation
See, e.g., Superior Oil Co. v. FPC, 322 F.2d 601, 619 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 922 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964); Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Boyd, 244 F.Supp. 889, 892 (D.D.C.1965) (informal rule-making proceedings “are analogous to hearings conducted by Congressional Committees”); cf. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U.S. 176, 186 , 56 S.Ct. 159, 163 , 80 L.Ed. 138 (1935) (“the presumption of the existence of facts justifying its specific exercise attaches alike to statutes, to municipal ordinances, and to orders of administrative bodies”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Kent Mason, Patricia Warren and Leorlin Boyd v. Department of Transportation, Drew Lewis, as Secretary, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Raymond A. Peck, Jr., as Administrator, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Intervenors. National Association of Independent Insurers, Automobile Owners Action Council, and Eugene J. Meyung v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Intervenors
See, e.g., Superior Oil Co. v. FPC, 322 F.2d 601, 619 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 922 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964); Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Boyd, 244 F.Supp. 889, 892 (D.D.C.1965) (informal rulemaking proceedings "are analogous to hearings conducted by Congressional Committees"); cf. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U.S. 176, 186 , 56 S.Ct. 159, 163 , 80 L.Ed. 138 (1935) ("the presumption of the existence of facts justifying its specific exercise attaches alike to statutes, to municipal ordinances, and to orders of administrative bodies") 20 In presenting…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, Inc
(4×)
Id. at 42-43 , 68 S.Ct. at 826 ; see also Mueller Co. v. FTC, 323 F.2d 44, 46 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Industrial Sand Association, a Delaware Corporation, the China Clay Producers, Intervenor v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Robert B. Lagather, Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, the Council of the Southern Mountains, Inc. v. F. Ray Marshall, in His Capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Robert Lagather, in His Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, China Clay Producers, Intervenor
Compare Superior Oil Co. v. FPC, 322 F.2d 601, 619 (9th Cir. 1963), Cert. denied, 377 U.S. 922 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964), With Automotive Parts & Accessories Association v. Boyd, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 200 , 206-208, 407 F.2d 330 , 336-38 (1968), And with Chrysler Corp. v. Dep't of Transportation, 472 F.2d 659 , 667-71 (6th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. Marshall
Compare Superior Oil Co. v. FPC, 322 F.2d 601, 619 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 922 , 84 S.Ct. 1219 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964), with Automotive Parts & Accessories Association v. Boyd, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 200 , 206-208, 407 F.2d 330 , 336-38 (1968), and with Chrysler Corp. v. Dep’t of Transportation, 472 F.2d 659 , 667-71 (6th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nationwide Chemical Corporation, a Corporation v. Wilburn T. Wright, an Individual
See, e. g., Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347, 351 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923 , 84 S.Ct. 1220 , 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964); Great Lakes Carbon Corp. v. Continental Oil Co., 219 F.Supp. 468, 475 (W.D.La.1963), aff’d per curiam, 345 F.2d 175 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965); 4 A. Deller, Deller’s Walker on Patents § 251, at 144 (2d ed. 1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mueller Company
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 835.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1964.
Thomas R. McMülen and A. G. Webber III for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, James Mcl. Henderson and Alvin L. Berman for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.