green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin Powder Co. v. Atlas Powder Co.
See International Manufacturing Co. v. Landon, Inc., 336 F.2d 723 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 988 , 85 S.Ct. 701 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 (1965), (holding that one asserting file wrapper estoppel must establish such a causal nexus).
cited
Cited "see"
Omark Industries, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.
See International Manufacturing Co. v. Landon, Inc., 336 F.2d 723, 727-728 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 988 , 85 S.Ct. 701 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Kenner
See United States v. Johnson, 337 F.2d 180, 196 (4th Cir.1964), cert. granted, 379 U.S. 988 , 85 S.Ct. 703 , 13 L.Ed.2d 609 (1965); United States v. Fromen, 265 F.2d 702, 705 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 909 , 79 S.Ct. 1295 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1260 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Timely Products Corp. v. Arron
See e. g., International Manufacturing Co. v. Landon, Inc., 336 F.2d 723, 728-729 (9 Cir. 1964) cert. denied 379 U.S. 988 , 85 S.Ct. 701 , 13 L.Ed.2d 610 (1965); Bewal, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., 292 F.2d 159 (10 Cir. 1961); Reeves Bros., Inc. v. U. S. Laminating Corp., 282 F.Supp. 118 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George E. Johnson v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 4 Cir., 337 F.2d 180 (1964), cert. granted, 379 U.S. 988 , 85 S.Ct. 703 , 13 L.Ed.2d 609 (1965). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Atlas Life Insurance Co.
v.
Atlas Life Insurance Co.
No. 489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1965.
Solicitor General Cox on the motion to enlarge the time for oral argument. Norris Darrell for respondent. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Daniel B. Goldberg on the motion for leave to participate in the oral argument.
Published
(Certiorari, ante, p, 927, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.) The motion of the Solicitor General to enlarge the time for oral argument is granted and a total of one hour is allotted to the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent is allotted a total of forty-five minutes for oral argument. The motion of the Attorney General of Louisiana et al. for leave to participate in the oral argument on behalf of the . respondent, as amici curiae, is granted.